THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY

[Fry Guy]

Why should we be spending money on that bullshit?

Which part is bullshit?


P.S.
@Fry Guy not responding to your post since you failed to answer the rest of my questions.

I thought you were being deliberately dishonest. If you are not:



https://bigleaguepolitics.com/police-aud...-supplies/

https://rwcnews.com/watch-puerto-rico-ac...d-her.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/10/us/pu...o-aid.html

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobr...n-n2490312



So no, while he obviously doesn't hate all Puerto Ricans nor dos he even hate all the Puerto Rico leadership, there are ABSOLUTELY some who play against him and their constituents interests for political reasons and he SHOULD critique Puerto Rico as a country (Puerto Rico's inability to look after its infrastructure, inability to distribute the aid they requested and want to blame Trump for everything but the Hurricane and not take any responsibility themselves). 

Why? Because it plays against Trump to get aid, pretend you never received it and then blame HIM for the "inefficiencies". 

Did Trump insult Obama first or did Obama insult Trump? I am going to file this under "Who cares?". I believe, and I could be wrong, that Obama was running for Presidency and that was the first missive from Trump. I believe too that IF a young recently annointed Junior senator who's background vaguely suggested that he grew up as a baby and child in Kenya and in adolescence in Indonesia and only later college years in America, was to suddenly be running for President with mysterious backing, absent Kenyan birth Dad and seemingly no verified connections to America before his college years...people COULD be understood having reservations as to his viability to be President. To be clear if the words Kenya was replaced with French and Indonesian replaced with Greece, it would not change the issue (it had nothing to do with race and everything to do with eligibility). Furthermore, Clinton had already suggested this was an issue. Trump capitalised on the issue. Was it insulting for Obama? Sure. Was its intent to needle Obama or address a presumed problem? I say the later. 

Besides they both gave as good as they got. Look at this effort from Obama! Sick burn:


California needs to do more than "rake its leaves". You are not going to quibble over this point as you know as well as everyone here the terrible forestry maintenance and horrific homeless/drug addict/open sewer issue in urban cities in California such as San Francisco. There are a few homeless people in Canberra. I probably see about half a dozen in any week. I would be considering myself REALLY unlucky if I was unlucky enough to step in dog shit in the city. Walking around in the suburbs less in the way of homeless people but dog shit is something you keep half an eye out for but are unlikely to inadvertently step in or see any. 

I could not imagine having to avoid dog shit, human shit, IV needles pro-actively. Fuck THAT shit. 

Should he call out California and their horrible policies and leadership and the citizens that elect them and support this? Fucking oath he should. 

As to companies being insulted? Fair. Here is an example, Google:



See my thinking is IF you are a President that is anti-establishment and companies are actively against you, your Administration, your party, your policies and your supporters, and refuse to respect this change and get with the program, then yes you as President should call out the company. Yes, a company IS its brand and, its actions, its owner and its leadership. Is it everyone who works for them? No. Most people in a company are not the maker of decisions or policy or influence the culture. 

Is that about it?

Your turn.