11-08-2021, 11:53 AM
(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.