11-08-2021, 12:50 PM
(11-08-2021, 12:42 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-08-2021, 12:28 PM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 12:07 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:53 AM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.
What evidence from the Treasury Dept. are you referring to?
You posted it, so I'll let you look for it. It was 4-5 months ago, give or take a month.
Bahahahahahahahahaha! Well alrighty then.
In the meantime, perhaps you should read the summary of IG Horowitz's report on the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation, because of your deep and profound concern for truth and democracy...
https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf