ELECTION 2020

[rothschild]

I love it when stuff plays out! I can't wait! It sounds so exciting!

What if it turns out that there are no "good guys" in this power struggle, that both sides are corrupt and intent on subjecting 75-85% of the global population to brutal, merciless austerity? Will you be able to live with that if you happen to be among the chosen few, or will you feel obligated to "check your privilege"?

I'd rather die than live under such circumstances, but for those who feel otherwise, I'm told that the High Priests of Transhumanism can genetically edit the human conscience, and a great many other wonders as well -- none of which have been studied for long-term consequences.

So yes, these are indeed very exciting times we are in, and far be it from me to suggest that you're being led to the slaughter, as I would hate to dampen your enthusiasm.

I appreciate that so much. But don't worry, my enthusiasm will not be dampened. (by you)
I know politicians are corrupt. I know political systems are corrupt. But I have to vote for who I think will do the best job, right now, with what we have. So I did that. And I can lay my head on my pillow at night and rest knowing I made that decision based on the knowledge I had.

I absolutely hope more will be revealed in the future. I hope for a change.

And as far as checking my prvivliege, yes I am aware of my privilege.

And sometimes the best thing I can do if I want to see change is to do things differently myself in my own world and community.

Let's see if you're sincere about what you've just said.


How would you defend the gain-of-function research on coronavirus, conducted at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill under Ralph Baric, of the CDC?

What other purpose does gain-of-function research serve aside from weaponization?

How do you defend that research subsequently being offshored to China's BSL-3 facility at Wuhan?

Do you really think it's a coincidence that Wuhan then became the geographic origin of the pandemic?

That is an intereting topic. Thank you for the question. It appears that research was halted in 2014. And then it looks like funding was was given again in 2017. 
It looks like the issue of transparency has been discussed several times.
And it looks like there were near misses and accidents that happened at UNC.
The only people that seem to be talking about weaponization and the Wuhan connection are cospiracy theorists.
But I will absolutely keep reading on this subject. So thank you.

One of the problems that was highlighted is that a scientist was bit by a mouse and then that scientist did not quarantene themselves. That is risky and should not be allowed.

I had posted an article previoiusly about the risks of mass travel and how a person can be in a jungle one day and back in thier office the next. Travel used to take longer and there needs to be stricter guidelines to this sort of travel. 

What is also concerning is a president who throws out the playbook and is only interested in blaming past administrations, another country and not taking ownership and not taking enough action and not having enough transparency.

One of the people I saw make reference to weaponization had been directly involved in drafting arms control legislation re biological weapons. I can get a name for you if you'd like me to. As far as I know, gain-of-function research has no application value aside from weaponization, which is why I asked you about it.