02-04-2011, 04:22 PM
just because guns were not used to kill does not imply there were not guns at the scene.
guns are traceable. bags and duct tape found at the scene are not.
gloved hands will not leave DNA evidence on the duct tape.
I truly believe you've about heard the end of this story as far as the press is concerned.
am i the only one on this board that knows the area where this happened, and also knows that this is not the sort of area that is sterotypically "thug-ridden" ?
guns are traceable. bags and duct tape found at the scene are not.
gloved hands will not leave DNA evidence on the duct tape.
I truly believe you've about heard the end of this story as far as the press is concerned.
am i the only one on this board that knows the area where this happened, and also knows that this is not the sort of area that is sterotypically "thug-ridden" ?