02-12-2011, 06:00 PM
(02-12-2011, 05:37 PM)TotallyCurious Wrote:(02-12-2011, 05:09 PM)netsleuth Wrote:(02-12-2011, 04:57 PM)shitstorm Wrote: Yes, it is. It's even more alarming and infuriating when you go down the social engineering rabbit hole and discover that this in not an organic sociological evolution but one that one has been manipulated by people who are not a part of this (gangster) culture whose objective is the destruction of America. To undermine a nation you must debase it's moral and social foundation.
I don't subscribe to this notion, personally.
Do you also believe that the Rockefeller's supported women's liberation
because they saw that fifty percent of society was not putting money
into their banks and if the workforce were doubled, so would their
banks' deposits? (I say this respectfully as I know people who
totally ascribe to this.)
If your question was aimed at me, my answer is a qualified yes. There's a lot more to it than increasing the income tax base (not necessarily bank deposits). It's about replacing the nuclear family with the state, which benefits an elite class of controllers (who also happen to think of the masses as useless eaters and sheep).
I support HUMAN rights. "Useful idiots" (not my term) often have no idea of the hidden agenda behind social movements which have been carefully planned and directed for a predictable outcome. Additionally, sometimes genuine, organic, movements get hijacked.