02-12-2011, 07:03 PM
Here are my reasons for not supporting the theory, expressed by a few others, that Maytee was a participant in planning, or had advance knowledge, of the unauthorized entry and robbery:
1) From her own past criminal experience, as well as the recent revenge killing of the robber who was Tiffany's boyfriend, she knows that these things can go terribly wrong, and she is highly unlikely to have condoned her son being put at risk to this extent; and
2) If she was involved in its planning or execution, and you believe that Tiffany was involved, then Maytee and Tiffany would have known of each other's involvement, in which case Maytee would certainly not want to antagonize Tiffany now by writing the things she has written attacking, accusing and condemning Tiffany.
In short, it is not logical to believe that both Maytee and Tiffany were involved in the planning or execution of the unauthorized entry and robbery.
If you pick one, you exclude the other. I pick Tiffany and exclude Maytee.
1) From her own past criminal experience, as well as the recent revenge killing of the robber who was Tiffany's boyfriend, she knows that these things can go terribly wrong, and she is highly unlikely to have condoned her son being put at risk to this extent; and
2) If she was involved in its planning or execution, and you believe that Tiffany was involved, then Maytee and Tiffany would have known of each other's involvement, in which case Maytee would certainly not want to antagonize Tiffany now by writing the things she has written attacking, accusing and condemning Tiffany.
In short, it is not logical to believe that both Maytee and Tiffany were involved in the planning or execution of the unauthorized entry and robbery.
If you pick one, you exclude the other. I pick Tiffany and exclude Maytee.