02-20-2011, 10:46 PM
(02-20-2011, 10:38 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote:(02-20-2011, 10:32 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote:(02-20-2011, 10:23 PM)TotallyCurious Wrote:(02-20-2011, 10:05 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote:(02-20-2011, 10:00 PM)TotallyCurious Wrote: There is no saying that there was something on Johnny that
John took when he tried to rescue Johnny. Inside of a
heel, back of a watch. arm of a sunglass......
Again... I pose the question... what would Maytee or John Sr. stand to gain by setting up or concealing the murder of their child?
That is not at all what is being implied. The circumstances offered them
the opportunity to take anything off of his body that might have
been suspicious. Say- keys.....papers.....chain.....any number of
things.
Sorry, still not satisfied. WHY would John Sr. remove anything from the scene, if they weren't involved & if you believe they were involved, I ask what would they have to gain?
There has been Nothing implied or stated here or Officially that John S took anything from that crime scene. Besides a broken heart.
Can't you see the parents as victims here? I sure can.
No offense but DUH! That's my point!!! I'm looking at the Clarkes as victims & always have been although it's been hard because of the way Maytee has publicly carried on. I DO see them as victims which is why I'm trying to comprehend why anyone would choose to think that the Clarkes in any way concealed evidence of the crime scene or took part in the set up or murder of their child which has been implied here over & over again!