02-20-2011, 11:08 PM
(02-20-2011, 10:22 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote:(02-20-2011, 10:05 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote:(02-20-2011, 10:00 PM)TotallyCurious Wrote: There is no saying that there was something on Johnny that
John took when he tried to rescue Johnny. Inside of a
heel, back of a watch. arm of a sunglass......
Again... I pose the question... what would Maytee or John Sr. stand to gain by setting up or concealing the murder of their child?
Me thinks, nothing. If anything was removed it might have been something symbolic that conveyed a message. Something that the finder may want to keep to themselves because "they can settle the score more efficiently than the police would"..I doubt that.....But I do agree with the possibility some others here have stated that the harm came to JC as some type of hate directed towards his parents. Its a terrible price to pay if someone is willing to do that to someone your children that you so dearly love to just to hurt you. This has got to be an immensely big heart break to all the family members who love and miss JC and LS.
The 100 year rule. Yes.