02-23-2011, 03:58 PM
(02-22-2011, 10:20 PM)lawheeze Wrote: I don't understand why some believe there wasn't always an intent to kill? Would a gang home invasion of people that know each other just end up with a couple tied up, able to talk? I think there's no way they would leave anyone alive to testify. I think the moment the perps put their plan into action, death was their intended outcome for the victims.
And I also don't get the idea that if one believes Tiff is involved that she somehow missed an opportunity to save JC & LS. If she was in on it, saving them from dying would be a betrayal of the gang and she would be the next target. She would not be "riding hard" for her gang friends if she aligned herself with the victims.
I don't think there are reluctant participants here. I think Tiff was either in it all the way or completely uninvolved.
I TOTALLY agree with this....in my mind, there was defint. INTENT to kill!