03-05-2011, 06:40 PM
(03-05-2011, 05:33 PM)jenjen Wrote:(03-05-2011, 12:58 PM)Adub Wrote: I read that Ohio just passed the law allowing DNA on arrest for a felony but that they do not have the funding in place. So new law not yet happening. But if the guilty party has already been convicted of a felony, Toledo is good to go.
But then I read in the news that this asswipe was arrested and charged with a horrendous murder all because of a DNA match made after an arrest for an unrelated felony.
http://crimevoice.com/dna-match-may-have...rder-3411/
They got the bastard and he will be held accountable.
So if someone close to me gets the DNA swab in a messed up situation, so be it. Stop getting yourself in messed-up situations.
TOTALLY agree with you Adub, it's a bullshit law...but, we're getting it.
Anyone in Ohio "ARRESTED" on a felony will have to submit to DNA as of July 1, 2011.
Here is a portion of the O.R.C.
LAW Writer® Ohio Laws and Rules Search ORC
» Title [29] XXIX CRIMES - PROCEDURE»
Chapter 2901: GENERAL PROVISIONS
2901.07 DNA specimen collection procedure.
In my opinion, there's a BIG difference between a charge on a police report and a CONVICTION.
In the future the taking of DNA will be like taking your "picture". It may become standard at the time of birth like taking a babys footprint. This coupled with that "Mark of the Beast" (basically a barcode that tracks your movements on some credit cards now) will really concentrate power under one central authority. And here I thought Facebook was invasive.