08-25-2011, 12:53 PM
(08-25-2011, 12:40 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Not wanting to disparage them by accusing them of being involved in the robbery that lead to their deaths (mere speculation on my part) is hardly nominating them for sainthood. I don't think I've canonized any of the players in this case, by a long shot.
Nor did I suggest you did.
It's ignoring the 'elephant in the room' not considering or voicing that one or both of the dear departed were possibly involved in a robbery gone wrong.
With their circle of "friends" . . . I'd venture to guess it's very likely probable.
Raising possibilities and probabilities is not disparaging the victims.
Stating that he willingly dropped his shorts and sold his ass for smokes, while serving time, is.
Especially if they were generic . . . not name brand ciggies.