08-25-2011, 06:59 PM
(08-25-2011, 06:54 PM)Sonny223 Wrote: absolutely not.. I do not think JC was "in" on the take.. It would have been a lot eaiser to just stage a robbery/burglary at the Longacre home while LS was at work..This way he could keep all the cash/gold or whatever was in the "safe" and no witness' this way also.. A lot less risky and potentially lethal as well, that is , not having others help on such a easy task.. All IMO.
Except for the fact he had:
1.) Access
2.) Prior conviction for robbery
You really don't think LE would consider him a suspect in an anonymous "break in" and theft?
He'd need a strong alibi.
And let's not forget -
3.) Knowledge