04-15-2012, 01:37 AM
(04-07-2012, 04:23 PM)kitty1 Wrote: I didn't mean to imply that LC was wrong nor did I mean to snap at you. Sorry, I simply meant that retaliation, revenge, a "set up" or even a "hit" have not been ruled out. It sounded to me that you were saying, that definitively, these motives/scenerios were ruled out. The media and/or LE may have stated that it was just a simple "robbery gone bad" , but that doesn't make it true.
The above statement is what kitty1 said over on Rantings of a Lunatic thread. Kitty1 is family and I respect what she has to say about the crime, she did answer my question awhile back & the Straub's had no Bed Bath and Beyond bags in the home. Going on what Kitty1 says I'm joining her we cannot rule out anything!
"A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone."
Henry David Thoreau
Henry David Thoreau