05-10-2012, 05:20 AM
If the only evidence that places Williams at the crime scene is DNA from the CIG BUT then Williams defense can make whatever they want up for the reason why the cig but was there.
He originally told detectives he was never at the STRAUBS house. But the judge will not let this information be said to the jury because Williams said he wanted his lawyer.
If the judge let the prosecutors use this information and Williams was found guilty; he easily could have been granted a mis trial and won an appeal.
He originally told detectives he was never at the STRAUBS house. But the judge will not let this information be said to the jury because Williams said he wanted his lawyer.
If the judge let the prosecutors use this information and Williams was found guilty; he easily could have been granted a mis trial and won an appeal.