05-21-2012, 12:06 AM
(05-20-2012, 10:16 PM)shitstorm Wrote: In defense of d5, without going back and reading his or hers previous posts, I haven't gotten the impression that s/he was defending Williams and Pettaway. Rather, my take was that s/he was concerned that some sort of conflict of interest could screw up the trial or possible conviction, as in a mistrial or overturning a conviction.
shitstorm,
d505, gave me the impression early on she was behind both fellows, she was upset with people who called Williams a monster, nothing like being cozy with a criminal - any man that bloody beats up his wife is a monster! or threatens to kill his wife is a monster. This also goes for Pettaway he's another monster I believe they have solid evidence against both of them, even if they are found innocent, I will not apologize!
d505 said;
"I find it awful that people call williams a monster before they know any SOLID evidence against him."
"A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone."
Henry David Thoreau
Henry David Thoreau