07-25-2012, 04:37 AM
(07-25-2012, 03:36 AM)imsuchawildflower Wrote: "We also know there was the DNA of an unknown male on the duct tape on the back of johnny Clarke's neck. We know that there was DNA left on the duct tape around Johnny Clarke's ankles by a woman who's never been identified."
They say the male DNA is of an "unknown male"
The female DNA is by a woman who's never been identified.
Big difference between unknown and unidentified.
Ithink they know who the woman is, and she will be identified,
because she is known, it just hasnt been told yet.
Could be just a play on words/poor use of words.
Not that I think that's the most likely; I think you picked up on something here.
On a less exciting note, maybe we'll find out the female DNA was never considered to be that of a killer but rather an original owner of the duct tape.; someone who has be completely cleared of wrong doing.
These guys are borrowing cigs from each other, its plausible that they would be borrowing tape too.
I would love to find out if it reveals another perp.
Main reason why someone isn't identified in higher profile cases is because they have become a valuable informant. Why else would they wait? The announced Sam and Cameo relatively fast once evidence built up. Or maybe its simply they have DNA and nothing else (not even consistent hear say).
Who are the two most prominent women in this case...Destiny and Alex. Then again, could be someone we've never even heard of.
I just hope they're not rushing this trial.