08-01-2012, 12:16 PM
(08-01-2012, 10:09 AM)soothsayer Wrote:(08-01-2012, 01:25 AM)Snoopy Wrote: Those conversations along with the DNA on the cigarettes were enough to say that both these guys were at the scene of the crime. DNA also says there were 2 others that were probably there, so does this mean that Cam and Sam were the ones that actually did the killing?, no it does not but as Lady Cop said before, everyone that was there, is equally guilty so that would not matter.
I love, respect, and fear LC, but I humbly disagree in this instance. I think there can be degrees of guilt. Say for instance they came along with robbery in mind, then the other aholes with them decided to off the kids, maybe when these fat asses were sharing their ciggy. Maybe they even smoked it in the garage, came back in and found the murders done, tossing the butt to the floor. Are they, in that case, just as guilty as the murderers? I don't think so. Of course, they may have been in on the murders, might have even been the brains and muscles behind them, but it can't be proven.
Sorry if im babbling... im on my phone and its kind of difficult to go back and revise
So....maybe all things being equal, all things are not equal?
I disagree. Even if his onlt intention was to rob them... it doesnt make up for the fact that whether or not he was the actual murderer... he knows who is! If he were even a good person in the slightest he would come clean and tell what happened and who else is involved. I dont give two shits if his life motto is " no snitching" this just proves what a worthless piece of shit he really is imo. Bottom line is this man knows what happened, whether or not he was the actual one to do the killing. Hes a piece of shit and he is only protecting other pieces of shit. Imo this makes him just as guilty. Who the hell PROTECTS murderers?