08-07-2012, 02:42 PM
There are two very lengthy court docs posted today dated 8-6-2011 in Re: to the Williams case. I'm not posting the links because they don't
stay open very long on here. So, I am posting just the conclusions.
Therefore, given the cases above, Defendant submits that the two counts of Aggravated Murder should merge and served concurrently as well.
Conclusion: The penalties in counts 1,2,4 and 5 may be consecutive to each other. The State does not opposed a concurrent sentence in Count 3. Due to the heinousness of these offenses, the State of Ohio would respectively request an appropriate sentence be imposed upon the defendant in accordance with his deeds.
stay open very long on here. So, I am posting just the conclusions.
Therefore, given the cases above, Defendant submits that the two counts of Aggravated Murder should merge and served concurrently as well.
Conclusion: The penalties in counts 1,2,4 and 5 may be consecutive to each other. The State does not opposed a concurrent sentence in Count 3. Due to the heinousness of these offenses, the State of Ohio would respectively request an appropriate sentence be imposed upon the defendant in accordance with his deeds.