08-19-2012, 10:04 PM
No I don't have anything twisted the only evidence against them was the cigarette. There was absolutely no other evidence against either one. As for the testimony from Eric why did that mean so much in Sams case why would they not use him in cameos? My guess is bc it was BS
Things he said didn't add up. How did they call cams brother when he was in jail, why would this Guy wait to speak up if he knew that whole time and they never looked at Sam until the DNA matched. The facts that Eric did use were things that were public the safe the money how they died, just bc he was already sentence doesn't mean he didn't have anything to gain. The detectives offered him a plea bargain he openly admitted to that. Sam called Cameo first bc he knew there was money on the phone he knew he would be able to reach someone for sure. As for the conversation they had not sure, I don't know why a past polygraph test, no evidence on the weapons used isn't enough for ppl to comprehend that cameo is innocent.
Things he said didn't add up. How did they call cams brother when he was in jail, why would this Guy wait to speak up if he knew that whole time and they never looked at Sam until the DNA matched. The facts that Eric did use were things that were public the safe the money how they died, just bc he was already sentence doesn't mean he didn't have anything to gain. The detectives offered him a plea bargain he openly admitted to that. Sam called Cameo first bc he knew there was money on the phone he knew he would be able to reach someone for sure. As for the conversation they had not sure, I don't know why a past polygraph test, no evidence on the weapons used isn't enough for ppl to comprehend that cameo is innocent.