08-20-2012, 01:57 AM
(08-19-2012, 10:04 PM)shell52486 Wrote: As for the testimony from Eric why did that mean so much in Sams case why would they not use him in cameos? My guess is bc it was BSIn Sam's trial, Eric's testimony is a report of a conversation with the defendant and is therefore admissible.
Things he said didn't add up.
In Cameo's trial, Eric's testimony would be hearsay because it was not a conversation directly with the defendant and therefore would be inadmissible. It has nothing to do with things not adding up.