06-08-2011, 12:26 PM
(06-07-2011, 03:03 PM)White Pud Wrote:(06-07-2011, 01:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Really so Mock has no standards for unsolicited pornography?
A shot of a blokes package completely covered with underwear is hardly "unsolicited pornography", either that or the underwear section of Abercrombie and Fitch is classed as porn now?
As usual this is the right blowing everything out of proportion yet again, I don't hear much condemnation of Newt Gingrich and his numerous affairs for example?
And the numerous Repubs caught with rent boys, at least they were commiting an illegal act.
Having said that you can send thousands of troops to their deaths based on lies just as long as you don't send a woman a bare chested photograph of yourself on Twitter.
Proportion?, try and get some dipshit.
Very well said. I might add, why would anyone be the least bit surprised that US politicians lie. We pay them to lie. I'm sure the right wing will conspiratize that he is a national security risk. His penis will bring down the democracy.