10-18-2011, 12:59 AM
I figured out why she keeps lying about where Johnny lived: He was still on probation and was supposed to be living with his parents. He was also supposed to be clean and sober (TASC). She is effen retarded for posting all those pics of him partying. What a complete dumbass. They should charge her for not supervising his probation like she should have. If she would have kept him home and kept him clean, he would be alive today.
Good job, Maytee.
PARTY : D1 - CLARK JOHN
6/1/2009 1 Title : FRM:CONVEYANCE ISSUED BY CLERK
INMATE # 577-017 FROM THE LONDON CORRECTIONAL INST
PARTY : D1 - CLARK JOHN
6/15/2009 1 Title : ORD:MOT JUDICIAL REL GRANTED
783-01688 issued by 175 ()
On June 15, 2009 a hearing was held pursuant to R.C.
2929.20 upon defendant's request for judicial release.
Court reporter JANET TERRY defense attorney JON D.
RICHARDSON and the State's attorney IAN ENGLISH were
present as was defendant JOHN CLARK. Pursuant to R.C.
2929.20(D) the victim or victim's representative was
notified.
After due consideration of the record, any oral or
written statements prepared, as well as the principles and
purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, and the
seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, the
Court finds that defendant is eligible for judicial
release, not now being subject to a mandatory prison term,
and further finds all of the following: that a non-prison
sanction does not demean the seriousness of the offense;
that a non-prison sanction will adequately punish
defendant and protect the public; that factors decreasing
seriousness outweigh those increasing seriousness; that
there is less likelihood of recidivism.
The Court finds on January 14, 2008 the defendant entered
a plea of No Contest and was found guilty by the Court of
the lesser included offense of Count One and Count Two,
Robbery, each a violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(2), each a
felony of the 2nd degree.
Finding the defendant now amenable to community control,
the Court modifies defendant's sentence AND THEREFORE
imposes 3 (three) years of community control to be
monitored by the Lucas County Adult Probation Department
specifically to include:1) Pursuant to R.C. 2901.07,
defendant ordered to submit to DNA testing; 2) Defendant
to pay restitution to victims; 3) Defendant to seek and
maintain gainful verifiable employment; 4) Defendant to
be assessed and abide by recommendations to participate in
TASC ; 5) Defendant not to be convicted of any
Municipal, State, or Federal Offenses; 6) Defendant must
abide by the laws of this state and this nation and may
not leave the State of Ohio without permission of this
Court and/or his/her supervising probation officer; 7)
Defendant to reside with parents; and 8) Defendant to have
no direct or indirect contact with co-defendants.
Defendant notified that violation of community control,
violation of any law, or leaving this state without
permission of the court or probation officer, will lead to
a longer or more restrictive sanction for defendant,
including the balance of prison term.
Pursuant to R.C. 2929.20, Defendant is ORDERED RELEASED to
the custody of the Lucas County Adult Probation Department
forthwith. Defendant to report to Lucas County Adult
Probation Department upon release.
Defendant found to have, or reasonably may be expected to
have, the means to pay all or part of the applicable costs
of supervision, confinement, assigned counsel, and
prosecution as authorized by law. Defendant ordered to
reimburse the State of Ohio and Lucas County for such
costs and to pay restitution . This order of
reimbursement and restitution is a judgment enforceable
pursuant to law by the parties in whose favor it is
entered. Defendant further ordered to pay the cost
assessed pursuant to R.C. 9.92©, 2929.18 and 2951.021.
Notification pursuant to R.C. 2947.23 given.
JUDGE DENISE ANN DARTT
This is what happened on Maytee's watch:
2/9/2011 1 Title : COMMUNITY CONTROL TERMINATED
DUE TO DEATH.
PARTY : D1 - CLARK JOHN
Maytee tried to blame the deaths on Lisa:
"VELEZ-MITCHELL: Do you think he had any enemies? That`s all I`m trying to figure out.
VAZQUEZ: No, he did not have any enemies. And actually, Lisa`s boyfriend was in prison for robbery and just got out of prison a couple months ago.
VELEZ-MITCHELL: Yes...
VAZQUEZ: Lisa`s ex-boyfriend was in prison for robbery. Yes, my son, no, he didn`t have any enemies. This has nothing to do with my son."
Again, good job, Maytee.
Good job, Maytee.
PARTY : D1 - CLARK JOHN
6/1/2009 1 Title : FRM:CONVEYANCE ISSUED BY CLERK
INMATE # 577-017 FROM THE LONDON CORRECTIONAL INST
PARTY : D1 - CLARK JOHN
6/15/2009 1 Title : ORD:MOT JUDICIAL REL GRANTED
783-01688 issued by 175 ()
On June 15, 2009 a hearing was held pursuant to R.C.
2929.20 upon defendant's request for judicial release.
Court reporter JANET TERRY defense attorney JON D.
RICHARDSON and the State's attorney IAN ENGLISH were
present as was defendant JOHN CLARK. Pursuant to R.C.
2929.20(D) the victim or victim's representative was
notified.
After due consideration of the record, any oral or
written statements prepared, as well as the principles and
purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, and the
seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, the
Court finds that defendant is eligible for judicial
release, not now being subject to a mandatory prison term,
and further finds all of the following: that a non-prison
sanction does not demean the seriousness of the offense;
that a non-prison sanction will adequately punish
defendant and protect the public; that factors decreasing
seriousness outweigh those increasing seriousness; that
there is less likelihood of recidivism.
The Court finds on January 14, 2008 the defendant entered
a plea of No Contest and was found guilty by the Court of
the lesser included offense of Count One and Count Two,
Robbery, each a violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(2), each a
felony of the 2nd degree.
Finding the defendant now amenable to community control,
the Court modifies defendant's sentence AND THEREFORE
imposes 3 (three) years of community control to be
monitored by the Lucas County Adult Probation Department
specifically to include:1) Pursuant to R.C. 2901.07,
defendant ordered to submit to DNA testing; 2) Defendant
to pay restitution to victims; 3) Defendant to seek and
maintain gainful verifiable employment; 4) Defendant to
be assessed and abide by recommendations to participate in
TASC ; 5) Defendant not to be convicted of any
Municipal, State, or Federal Offenses; 6) Defendant must
abide by the laws of this state and this nation and may
not leave the State of Ohio without permission of this
Court and/or his/her supervising probation officer; 7)
Defendant to reside with parents; and 8) Defendant to have
no direct or indirect contact with co-defendants.
Defendant notified that violation of community control,
violation of any law, or leaving this state without
permission of the court or probation officer, will lead to
a longer or more restrictive sanction for defendant,
including the balance of prison term.
Pursuant to R.C. 2929.20, Defendant is ORDERED RELEASED to
the custody of the Lucas County Adult Probation Department
forthwith. Defendant to report to Lucas County Adult
Probation Department upon release.
Defendant found to have, or reasonably may be expected to
have, the means to pay all or part of the applicable costs
of supervision, confinement, assigned counsel, and
prosecution as authorized by law. Defendant ordered to
reimburse the State of Ohio and Lucas County for such
costs and to pay restitution . This order of
reimbursement and restitution is a judgment enforceable
pursuant to law by the parties in whose favor it is
entered. Defendant further ordered to pay the cost
assessed pursuant to R.C. 9.92©, 2929.18 and 2951.021.
Notification pursuant to R.C. 2947.23 given.
JUDGE DENISE ANN DARTT
This is what happened on Maytee's watch:
2/9/2011 1 Title : COMMUNITY CONTROL TERMINATED
DUE TO DEATH.
PARTY : D1 - CLARK JOHN
Maytee tried to blame the deaths on Lisa:
"VELEZ-MITCHELL: Do you think he had any enemies? That`s all I`m trying to figure out.
VAZQUEZ: No, he did not have any enemies. And actually, Lisa`s boyfriend was in prison for robbery and just got out of prison a couple months ago.
VELEZ-MITCHELL: Yes...
VAZQUEZ: Lisa`s ex-boyfriend was in prison for robbery. Yes, my son, no, he didn`t have any enemies. This has nothing to do with my son."
Again, good job, Maytee.