06-26-2015, 11:20 PM
I think Thomas was trying to sell the position that individuals are responsible for their own dignity, regardless of their rights, in order to justify his dissenting opinion.
I think his position is wrong, and his examples were terrible.
And, I doubt that he would have made that dignity argument if he'd been on the 1967 Supreme Court and was ruling on whether interracial couples should have the right to marry.
I think his position is wrong, and his examples were terrible.
And, I doubt that he would have made that dignity argument if he'd been on the 1967 Supreme Court and was ruling on whether interracial couples should have the right to marry.