09-29-2015, 05:09 PM
(09-29-2015, 04:06 PM)Blindgreed1 Wrote: So... The question is: where does one draw the line between "pandering" and "progressive?"
I think that's subjective and a matter of personal opinion.
For me, Clinton's changes in stance on criminal justice reform and gay marriage are probably simply indicative of keeping up with current society and moving forward accordingly.
In regards to the changes in stance on Social Security caps and tuition-free community college, that's probably an attempt not to lose liberal votes to Bernie Sanders. And, may also be an attempt to combat some Democrats' complaints that she's more like a Republican when it comes to catering to the rich.
As for immigration, Clinton's always been moderate. I imagine she's swung further to the left, at least in part, to pander to the large Hispanic voter base.