10-07-2015, 11:40 PM
He certainly was not articulate in his original statement. But to believe there was a cabal to form a committee for the sole purpose of damaging Hillary is laughable. A US Ambassador was killed in a terrorist attack. Any party in charge would form a committee and investigate it fully to get answers.
People think Hillary is dishonest and untrustworthy because she's done things to make people view her that way. The NY Times, not the Benghazi Committee, not Republican operatives, broke the story about her private email server.
She's taking advantage of McCarthy's fumble, that's politics 101. But she can't change what she did or the poor decisions she's made by claiming 'witch hunt' or 'vast right-wing conspiracy'. And that's why her trustworthiness and viability is in question.
People think Hillary is dishonest and untrustworthy because she's done things to make people view her that way. The NY Times, not the Benghazi Committee, not Republican operatives, broke the story about her private email server.
She's taking advantage of McCarthy's fumble, that's politics 101. But she can't change what she did or the poor decisions she's made by claiming 'witch hunt' or 'vast right-wing conspiracy'. And that's why her trustworthiness and viability is in question.