07-06-2016, 11:01 PM
(07-06-2016, 03:23 PM)Blindgreed1 Wrote:You just proved what I said above. At least three of the above stories make it clear that the two highest intel sources closest to Saddam made it plain there were no WMD's and were completely ignored by Bush and Blair. Even the top UK spies who originally claimed a huge discovery of WMD's quietly refuted that info a year later...and their refutations were ignored as well. The people who wanted war and could make it happen sold their respective countries a boatload of outright lies, that evidence is now showing they KNEW were outright lies. And in the case of Bush and Rove, whitewashed the entire thing after the fact by deleting millions of emails and shredding documents.(07-06-2016, 02:58 PM)Duchess Wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016...aq-chilcot(07-06-2016, 02:56 PM)Blindgreed1 Wrote: Bad intel from our friends across the pond
Are you saying that's what caused the United States to invade Iraq?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...emory.html
https://www.rt.com/uk/349700-faulty-inte...cot-blair/
http://www.e-ir.info/2012/07/25/why-was-...-2003-war/
There have been a few stories on this lately.
But somehow Hillary is the criminal lol.
Thank god I am oblivious to the opinions of others while caught in the blinding splendor of my own cleverness.