12-21-2014, 10:03 AM
GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNING MOCK. I hope everyone is feeling as chipper as I am this morning !
I think I am seeing part of the issue here. The pro gun side asks what the anti side calls, the same old moldy questions because we keep getting the same old hum drum answers. I feel this is a question about deaths and when it is OK to cause one.
No a auto is not intended as a killing tool and no the rules are not the same for them as they are for firearms, but the fact still remains that they cause more deaths every year than a firearm ever thought of. So why are we not looking harder at auto safety than we are firearm safety?
I guess where the big difference between the sides is that the pro gun side is looking at the number of deaths every year caused by any given object and the anti side is looking at the cause of death and overlooking the number.
I hope I am not being sleep deprived here and that makes sense.
I think I am seeing part of the issue here. The pro gun side asks what the anti side calls, the same old moldy questions because we keep getting the same old hum drum answers. I feel this is a question about deaths and when it is OK to cause one.
No a auto is not intended as a killing tool and no the rules are not the same for them as they are for firearms, but the fact still remains that they cause more deaths every year than a firearm ever thought of. So why are we not looking harder at auto safety than we are firearm safety?
I guess where the big difference between the sides is that the pro gun side is looking at the number of deaths every year caused by any given object and the anti side is looking at the cause of death and overlooking the number.
I hope I am not being sleep deprived here and that makes sense.