07-06-2015, 09:47 AM
(07-06-2015, 08:49 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: No HotD the anti gunners don't want to compromise. They want to take take take and if that taking requires them to do it in baby steps instead of strides that is what they will do. I don't consider it compromising when all they did was say , we wont go after magazine capacity's or types of firearms . . . this time. If they really want to compromise make it a give and take. Give us something like, lets say, dropping the BS AOW or NFA paperwork and fee requirements. I mean after all everyone will be checked out now so the type of firearm shouldn't matter anymore. Or give us a nationwide stand your ground law. Or a nation wide constitutional carry law. Give us something. Its only a compromise when both sides get something in return.
You keep talking about what more gun owners should be given, for less work/cost.
You go so far as to deny that children were ever unintentionally killed with guns when you were a kid because it doesn't fit your agenda, even though that defies all common sense, logic, and the claims of the NRA.
You've already admitted upthread when I asked you point blank that you see anyone who isn't "with you" when it comes to your views on guns as "against you", and that's that.
You automatically deflect the sound rationale of those who want to make society safer, without infringing on your right to bear arms, on the basis of fear that someday some way somebody might try to take away some of your arsenal. Etc...
Clearly, you don't understand what "give and take", compromise or negotiation means F.U. At least, not when it comes to guns.
You already have the right to bear arms, and not in a "well-regulated" manner.