10-10-2015, 01:08 PM
(10-10-2015, 10:05 AM)Midwest Spy Wrote: To my knowledge, the mother of the Oregon massacre can not be prosecuted for the actions of her son even though we'll most likely find out that the guns he used were in fact purchased by her.
I say charge her now.
Why not start with "aiding and abetting"?
Quit pussy-footing around and start using the laws we have on the books.
Let her defend HER actions instead of lawful gun owners defending their Constitutional rights.
If she provided a weapon to her fucked-up kid, she is culpable under existing laws.
How many new laws will it take to define "well regulated" for some of you?
Crazies and criminals do not respect the rights of others.
Maybe it's time we start using their playbook against them . . . Quid Pro Quo.
BTW - Your paranoia regarding your kids' safety at school might be considered a mental illness. Just sayin' . . .