10-14-2017, 07:45 PM
I disagree with your ignorant bony white ass, user.
It's clear to me that a lot of people are paying major attention to threats on First Amendment rights, now more than ever.
We're dealing with a president who labels all factual news which is unfavorable to him as "fake". A president who completely ignores the reasons given by black athletes who participate in silent and peaceful protests and instead puts words in their mouths by claiming they're unpatriotic flag-haters who should be fired for exercising their First Amendment rights in a way he doesn't like. He often does this at the same time he's spewing complete and easily proven bullshit and issuing threats to restrict the free press in the United States.
In my opinion, those are real and more important threats than what you consider a politically correct infringement on your right to refer to blacks as 'niggas' or 'niggers'.............. or wherever you're at with that internal struggle.
Your rights to call blacks 'niggers', and Hispanics 'spics', and women 'cunts', and all that jazz.......are as secure as they ever were. It's just that the First Amendment rights of others to express their lack of respect for your thinking and talking like Archie Bunker did 40 years ago (which even then was funny because it was ignorant and unabashed) are secure as well.
Anyway, I do agree that the people paying major attention to First Amendment protections are often not the same people who are incredibly focused on trying to defend and define every firearm and accessory as constitutionally protected by the Second Amendment (which they're clearly not).
It's clear to me that a lot of people are paying major attention to threats on First Amendment rights, now more than ever.
We're dealing with a president who labels all factual news which is unfavorable to him as "fake". A president who completely ignores the reasons given by black athletes who participate in silent and peaceful protests and instead puts words in their mouths by claiming they're unpatriotic flag-haters who should be fired for exercising their First Amendment rights in a way he doesn't like. He often does this at the same time he's spewing complete and easily proven bullshit and issuing threats to restrict the free press in the United States.
In my opinion, those are real and more important threats than what you consider a politically correct infringement on your right to refer to blacks as 'niggas' or 'niggers'.............. or wherever you're at with that internal struggle.
Your rights to call blacks 'niggers', and Hispanics 'spics', and women 'cunts', and all that jazz.......are as secure as they ever were. It's just that the First Amendment rights of others to express their lack of respect for your thinking and talking like Archie Bunker did 40 years ago (which even then was funny because it was ignorant and unabashed) are secure as well.
Anyway, I do agree that the people paying major attention to First Amendment protections are often not the same people who are incredibly focused on trying to defend and define every firearm and accessory as constitutionally protected by the Second Amendment (which they're clearly not).