Mock

Full Version: Tucson LOVES The C.L.I.T.T.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
hah

[Image: download.php?rand=348346&folder=INBOX&ui...ng=base64&]
I can't see your image, Gunnar.

But, here's a photo that came up in a Google search.

[Image: 1405349074-streetclitt590.jpg]

Much sexier sounding than our San Francisco B.A.R.T system.
Or the one from Fresno
(07-28-2014, 06:41 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: [ -> ]Or the one from Fresno

hah Took a second for that to register...


Does this one show?

[Image: 10394616_1503032903247648_7526244520784653947_n.png]
It's a favourite of the Tucson Womens Acrobatic Team. Sits right at the top
Yeah, I can see it, Duchess.

The C.L.I.T.T. is certainly better than some of the other system names that were under consideration.

One name that was on the table was The Semi-Hydraulic Intercity Transit System, but that one got dumped. Seems no one in Tucson, especially not the T.W.A.T., was excited about the prospect of having The S.H.I.T.S. running through the city.


Thanks, honey. I inserted the first one in BG's post for him & I don't know why it didn't show up.
The tram is absolutely worthless unles you're a drunk student attending the U of A. It costs 4 bucks a day to ride and its a 4 mile loop around the U.
Currently Useless Network of Trams?
Yup, that's appropriate.
There is a great big need for proof readers in this country.
(07-29-2014, 11:48 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]There is a great big need for proof readers in this country.
Are you implying that 4th avenue underpants is not an appropriate reference for this story? hah
(07-29-2014, 11:51 AM)Blindgreed1 Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-29-2014, 11:48 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]There is a great big need for proof readers in this country.
Are you implying that 4th avenue underpants is not an appropriate reference for this story? hah

Go back to bed...........
[Image: 561167_370.jpg]


Oh man *shudders*
hah


Sex dolls have come a long way -

[Image: 6a00d8341cb01f53ef0133ed0eeb8f970b-pi]

[Image: 171224.jpg]
Smiley_emoticons_skeptisch That better not give me nightmares!
(07-29-2014, 02:15 PM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]Smiley_emoticons_skeptisch That better not give me nightmares!


They are lovely, aren't they. They are anatomically correct. Smiley_emoticons_smile
Pages: 1 2