03-25-2022, 02:13 PM
I have to say that this is the best I've ever seen from Cruz. I think the fact that Jackson refused to address the quotes from Kendi strongly suggests that she values politics above honesty.
(03-25-2022, 03:23 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]He was talking about a book at a private school. Not public. He was baiting and she didn't bite. I'll take her values over Cruz's any day.
(03-25-2022, 08:23 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]A big difference.
(03-25-2022, 02:13 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say that this is the best I've ever seen from Cruz.
(03-26-2022, 04:25 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ](03-25-2022, 02:13 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say that this is the best I've ever seen from Cruz.
For fucks sake! You have exceedingly poor judgement skills. I wasn't going to get drawn into this ridiculous bullshit, but you really needed to know that.
(03-26-2022, 04:25 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ](03-25-2022, 02:13 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say that this is the best I've ever seen from Cruz.
For fucks sake! You have exceedingly poor judgement skills. I wasn't going to get drawn into this ridiculous bullshit, but you really needed to know that.
(03-26-2022, 10:25 AM)sally Wrote: [ -> ](03-26-2022, 04:25 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ](03-25-2022, 02:13 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say that this is the best I've ever seen from Cruz.
For fucks sake! You have exceedingly poor judgement skills. I wasn't going to get drawn into this ridiculous bullshit, but you really needed to know that.
She has imposed lighter sentences for child porn than federal guidelines recommend several times. So for you to support her just because she's a black woman is far worse judgment skills. And I dont care that it is common and other judges do it as well, I dont think they're great either. They should all be held accountable when these sickos get out and do it again when they were given lighter sentences.
(03-26-2022, 11:02 AM)sally Wrote: [ -> ]Regardless, they should still be given the maximum sentence...
(03-26-2022, 11:07 AM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ](03-26-2022, 11:02 AM)sally Wrote: [ -> ]Regardless, they should still be given the maximum sentence...
Why?
Incarcerating end users doesn't fix these sorts of systemic issues. If it did drug addiction would have been over and done with a long time ago. It's a tremendous waste of resources that should be utilized to attack the root of the problem.
(03-26-2022, 11:23 AM)sally Wrote: [ -> ](03-26-2022, 11:07 AM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ](03-26-2022, 11:02 AM)sally Wrote: [ -> ]Regardless, they should still be given the maximum sentence...
Why?
Incarcerating end users doesn't fix these sorts of systemic issues. If it did drug addiction would have been over and done with a long time ago. It's a tremendous waste of resources that should be utilized to attack the root of the problem.
They are obviously not going to use the resources for that, however. So as long as there is a market for it than those who are contributing to it in anyway are committing a crime that is worthy of the maximum sentence.
(03-26-2022, 11:10 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]Democrats think child porn criminals are able to be rehabilitated.
(03-26-2022, 11:02 AM)sally Wrote: [ -> ]Regardless, they should still be given the maximum sentence. I've seen marijuana offenders get harsher sentences than people contributing to child pornography.
(03-26-2022, 11:10 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]Democrats think child porn criminals are able to be rehabilitated.
(03-26-2022, 01:24 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ](03-26-2022, 11:10 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]Democrats think child porn criminals are able to be rehabilitated.
Do you have any examples? I ask because I don't know anyone who believes kiddie diddlers can be rehabilitated. If anything, most people have heard it's not likely.