Mock

What would the world be like?

(01-18-2012, 01:09 PM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]What would the world be like?

The world would be destroyed twice as fast as it is being destroyed now.

I forgot to mention that sheet metal would be a thing of the past!

(01-18-2012, 01:21 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]I forgot to mention that sheet metal would be a thing of the past!

Neverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!

Everyone knows that injection mold is the wave of the future, if we were twice as smart it would already be the norm and rusting spot welds and caustic galvanization would be banned.

Go-go 3D fax machines.

Dick would have an i.q. of 160!

(01-18-2012, 03:11 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Dick would have an i.q. of 160!

That would 296, you do the math if you can.

I would be a genius!

(01-18-2012, 03:15 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-18-2012, 03:11 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Dick would have an i.q. of 160!

That would 296, you do the math if you can.

So you ARE one of those rare combinations of BEAUTY and BRAINS??

Bravo!

(01-18-2012, 04:19 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

Are you hittin' on Dick?

At least you're asking. FuckedUp2 would've just assumed I was.

Twice as smart.....wouldnt make a fuck-alls worth of difference in the world today. Now, if we were to increase common sense two-fold in the worlds population, THAT would be significant.

I think logic would be our new "common sense" Everyone would have double the IQ so an IQ of 50 would become as smart as I am. Things would be way different in maggots ultra smart world.

I think the world would benefit from moral development. IQ is basically a fixed number (plus or minus 5 points), but moral development can be taught. I know some super smart people who don't have high IQs and some fucking idiots that do.

Don't look this up, Maggot, just tell what you think he should have done and why. Anybody can play:

In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $ 1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: "No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it." So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's store to steal the drug-for his wife. Should the husband have done that?

(01-18-2012, 04:26 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-18-2012, 04:19 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

Are you hittin' on Dick?

At least you're asking. FuckedUp2 would've just assumed I was.

You are correct. The more you post, the more I think I'm right.

(01-18-2012, 07:46 PM)Cracker Wrote: [ -> ]I think the world would benefit from moral development. IQ is basically a fixed number (plus or minus 5 points), but moral development can be taught. I know some super smart people who don't have high IQs and some fucking idiots that do.

Don't look this up, Maggot, just tell what you think he should have done and why. Anybody can play:

In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $ 1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: "No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it." So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's store to steal the drug-for his wife. Should the husband have done that?

No he should of just said "Son.........its the only Mother you will ever have"

Jesus, Maggot. I don't think the psychologist has an answer for you.

Check it yourself, but I am thinking stage 4. You can be trusted with a wallet, but not be put in charge of the nuclear warhead button: http://faculty.weber.edu/tlday/Resources/Kohlberg.html

Oh yeah.......bringing in Kohlberg's theory to try and gain some kind of illumination into the psych of people is kind of lamo there greasy cheeks.