Mock

it was group that thought the price was too high for the night of frolicking with the whores.

What has really made it what it is is that they bragged about being obamas security, allowed whores into their room where the security plans were and then didn't want to pay for the nasty snatch.

Still a skanky whore with a nasty snatch.

You can't wash that shit off in the morning.

(04-22-2012, 11:50 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Still a skanky whore with a nasty snatch.

You can't wash that shit off in the morning.

Umm... Wrongo señor deek. Those Colombian women cast spells with their looks and bodies. Men are simply moths being led to the flame. Not a thing they could've done.

Human nature, buddy!

(04-22-2012, 11:47 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

This is (allegedly) one of the women.

Hmmm, I would definately "Stiff" her

What bothers me the most about this story is not the hookers/sex bit. Whatever on that. What is truly bothersome is that our Secret Service agents were so stupid on so many levels. Brilliant to invite hookers into an area with official government docs. If true, equally brilliant to refuse payment rather than settle up (which more likely would have assured silence). Moronic decisions made by men working in a very important official governmental capacity. Disturbing, imo.

12 men are under investigation, according to latest CNN article below.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/22/politics/u...index.html

(04-23-2012, 12:08 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]What bothers me the most about this story is not the hookers/sex bit. Whatever on that. What is truly bothersome is that our Secret Service agents were so stupid on so many levels. Brilliant to invite hookers into an area with official government docs. If true, equally brilliant to refuse payment rather than settle up (which more likely would have assured silence). Moronic decisions made by men working in a very important official governmental capacity. Disturbing, imo.

12 men are under investigation, according to latest CNN article below.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/22/politics/u...index.html

That is EXACTLY the issue here. The hookers were actually no big deal, thats been going on for centuries. The real issue is the idiocy of the guys involved given what they were there to do and the potential risks they took without thinking about it.

Hope it was worth their jobs. Idiots.

Obamas Backdoor Bandits are at it again
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...y-car.html

Gives "SECRET SERVICE " a whole new meaning.

(04-26-2012, 05:57 PM)snoopdog Wrote: [ -> ]Gives "SECRET SERVICE " a whole new meaning.

Ha. If those agents could have conducted themselves like proper man whores and ensured the "secret" part, they might still be getting serviced.

Morons.

What a hilarious story.

Secret service indeed. That girl is cute though. Such nice hips.

(04-25-2012, 10:09 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: [ -> ]Obamas Backdoor Bandits are at it again
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...y-car.html

WTF - guys throw a person out of a car, deliberately risk to run her over, then just leave after succeeding, and all they are punished with is a reducement of rank? Wow.

Just catching up on news. This Secret Service prostitution scandal is really starting to widen.

New allegations (with confirmations underway) about Secret Service agents in El Salvador routinely establishing a "discreet" strip club and then taking the girls back to their government-paid-for hotel rooms, with governmental documents therein. This strip club had a "VIP room" where the agents could get extra services. Again, I could care less about the partying with hookers part, but there was no need to risk national security in the process; keep it at the "club" - simple enough. So stupid and greedy; really pisses me off.

With an independent investigation being planned across regions by Homeland Security, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg.

So, what's being done by the Secret Service Director's office to minimize future potential security breaches such as this? Here's what I've read in various pieces about the scandal:

- More cultural training and stricter rules about alcohol consumption and the types of establishments that agents are allowed to visit while on assigment.
-Activey recruit and hire more female agents.
- A supervisor from the Secret Service's Office of Professional Responsibility will accompany all "jump teams" on assignments.

IDK, seems pretty sad to me that we have to send a traveling babysitter to accompany professionals trusted with protecting our nation's security. Whatever it takes, I guess.

Here's one good update on the story:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/27/politics/s...?hpt=hp_t2

P.s. The linked article identifies the agent who stiffed the hooker in Cartagena and brought this scandal to the limelight. I don't care about who he is though; sounds like a rampant problem and if it weren't this dipshit, it would have been some other one soon enough.

So much for the cool sunglasses.

Whose actaully in charge of these idiots? Hmmmmmmmm.

His name wouldn't be Mr. President would it?

another Obama shuck and jive.

(04-28-2012, 11:07 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]So much for the cool sunglasses.

Whose actaully in charge of these idiots? Hmmmmmmmm.

His name wouldn't be Mr. President would it?

another Obama shuck and jive.

I hear ya, Dick. The buck's gotta stop somewhere. BUT, I think this shit has probably been going on for ages, on a wide scale, under several presidents. Doesn't sound like there have ever been any serious check points. Let's hope this idiotic scandal is the catalyst to making some real changes that minimize chances for national security being breached just so a bunch of married guys can get some foreign ass on the side.

(04-28-2012, 11:13 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]

(04-28-2012, 11:07 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]So much for the cool sunglasses.

Whose actaully in charge of these idiots? Hmmmmmmmm.

His name wouldn't be Mr. President would it?

another Obama shuck and jive.

I hear ya, Dick. The buck's gotta stop somewhere. BUT, I think this shit has probably been going on for ages, on a wide scale, under several presidents. Doesn't sound like there have ever been any serious check points. Let's hope this idiotic scandal is the catalyst to making some real changes that minimize chances for national security being breached just so a bunch of married guys can get some foreign ass on the side.

When you run on hopey changey, the clean up needs to start in your own house.

It doen't matter how long it's been going on, it only matters where it ends.

(04-28-2012, 11:15 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]When you run on hopey changey, the clean up needs to start in your own house.

It doen't matter how long it's been going on, it only matters where it ends.

Maybe so. But, are you gonna give Obama credit for cleaning this shit up if major improvements are made when he's in office? You know I'm undecided about which asshole I'll be voting for next and an independent, so I put credit and blame squarely where it belongs (imo) and it doesn't affect me in any way; unaffiliated with no party loyalties.

Similarly, will you give Obama credit for ending this war if troops are brought home while he's in office? I could be wrong, but I get the sense you might hestitate in giving him credit for ending anything. Just asking.

Good morning, by the way.