(05-18-2012, 11:45 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ] (05-18-2012, 11:41 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Sonny, what would you do if Donovan came at you, wielding his big bad filleting vocabulary? Would you be scared?
He'd probably ask for a blow or hand job. It seems to be a recurring theme with him.
I don't know, user. Sonny sometimes surprises me. Maybe he'll answer.
I would be tickled pink like the color of her pussy. Haha
(05-18-2012, 11:48 PM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]I would be tickled pink like the color of her pussy. Haha
Speaking of pussy, I bet duchess' is shaved and clean and stays nice and wet while your pouring the meat to her! Anybody agree?
(05-18-2012, 11:41 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Sonny, what would you do if Donovan came at you, wielding his big bad filleting vocabulary? Would you be scared?
Donovans vocabulary
Wow,what a threat!
Donoboy do you ride? I seen your agreement in the other thread, you have to forgive sally she sometimes feels unappreciated.
(05-18-2012, 11:53 PM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of pussy, I bet duchess' is shaved and clean and stays nice and wet while your pouring the meat to her! Anybody agree?
Not interested in that.
But, I have another question for you. How would you stop the hoodrat crime?
Hoodrat crime? Fight fire with fire.. Get the mentality built in your brain you will not be a victim! Mentality first, action second! Everybody must get firearm qualified.
(05-19-2012, 12:10 AM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]Hoodrat crime? Fight fire with fire.. Get the mentality built in your brain you will not be a victim! Mentality first, action second! Everybody must get firearm qualified.
Firearms for self-defense, right? You're not advocating vigilantism, are you Sonny?
(05-19-2012, 12:20 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:10 AM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]Hoodrat crime? Fight fire with fire.. Get the mentality built in your brain you will not be a victim! Mentality first, action second! Everybody must get firearm qualified.
Only for self-defense, right? You're not advocating vigilantism, are you Sonny?
his post did not relate to yours.
Fire with fire is a term used only in defense, and firearms qualified shows a propensity toward legality.
innuendo sucks ass and is a Ma characteristic.
Dear sonny, I'm very conflicted with regards to the 2012 election. Who should I vote for?
(05-19-2012, 12:22 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:20 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:10 AM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]Hoodrat crime? Fight fire with fire.. Get the mentality built in your brain you will not be a victim! Mentality first, action second! Everybody must get firearm qualified.
Only for self-defense, right? You're not advocating vigilantism, are you Sonny?
his post did not relate to yours.
Fire with fire is a term used only in defense, and firearms qualified shows a propensity toward legality.
innuendo sucks ass and is a Ma characteristic.
I asked about how to stop crime, not how to protect yourself from it. One is offensive and one is defensive. Asking for clarification...
(05-19-2012, 12:27 AM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Dear sonny, I'm very conflicted with regards to the 2012 election. Who should I vote for?
Haha, good question! I'm looking for something to sway me...
(05-19-2012, 12:29 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:22 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:20 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:10 AM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]Hoodrat crime? Fight fire with fire.. Get the mentality built in your brain you will not be a victim! Mentality first, action second! Everybody must get firearm qualified.
Only for self-defense, right? You're not advocating vigilantism, are you Sonny?
his post did not relate to yours.
Fire with fire is a term used only in defense, and firearms qualified shows a propensity toward legality.
innuendo sucks ass and is a Ma characteristic.
I asked about how to stop crime, not how to protect yourself from it. One is offensive and one is defensive. Asking for clarification...
Stopping crime is always proactive, not passive.
(05-19-2012, 12:33 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Stopping crime is always proactive, not passive.
So noted.
So okay, completely separate and unrelated question. Does Sonny advocate vigilantism?
(05-19-2012, 12:33 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:29 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:22 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:20 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:10 AM)Sonny223 Wrote: [ -> ]Hoodrat crime? Fight fire with fire.. Get the mentality built in your brain you will not be a victim! Mentality first, action second! Everybody must get firearm qualified.
Only for self-defense, right? You're not advocating vigilantism, are you Sonny?
his post did not relate to yours.
Fire with fire is a term used only in defense, and firearms qualified shows a propensity toward legality.
innuendo sucks ass and is a Ma characteristic.
I asked about how to stop crime, not how to protect yourself from it. One is offensive and one is defensive. Asking for clarification...
Stopping crime is always proactive, not passive.
Who said passive (besides you)? Neither offense or defense is passive.
Just ask a football team.
(05-19-2012, 12:48 AM)username Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:33 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:29 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:22 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:20 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]Only for self-defense, right? You're not advocating vigilantism, are you Sonny?
his post did not relate to yours.
Fire with fire is a term used only in defense, and firearms qualified shows a propensity toward legality.
innuendo sucks ass and is a Ma characteristic.
I asked about how to stop crime, not how to protect yourself from it. One is offensive and one is defensive. Asking for clarification...
Stopping crime is always proactive, not passive.
Who said passive (besides you)? Neither offense or defense is passive.
Just ask a football team.
I hate leaving all of the quotes.
stop being a fuckwit user.
(05-19-2012, 12:36 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (05-19-2012, 12:33 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Stopping crime is always proactive, not passive.
So noted.
So okay, completely separate and unrelated question. Does Sonny advocate vigilantism?
Not in my opinion.
He advocates taking responsibility to protext yourself.
God and everyone knows Cops are report takers.
(05-19-2012, 12:56 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]I hate leaving all of the quotes.
stop being a fuckwit user.
user's point was valid, Dick. But, I think we lost Sonny, damn it. Now, I might never know his advice about how to vote in the 2012 election!
(05-19-2012, 12:56 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]stop being a fuckwit user.
Never!!!
(05-19-2012, 12:57 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Not in my opinion.
He advocates taking responsibility to protext yourself.
God and everyone knows Cops are report takers.
Protexts himself? I guess that means he leaves the caps on...
har, har, I keel me.
