Kick them to the curb. They are 10 times more violent than the Tea party movement and deserve nothing for not using the avenues of democratic process. I think it is a diversion and the idiots are pawns in a bigger game. Now they are claiming to own "bank transfer day" as their own when the "move your money" people have been saying that for the past 10 years now. They are scumbags and sit at the bottom of the social ladder like a bunch of spoiled degenerate hoodlums. They are to stupid to see past their texting fingertips. I hope they freeze to death. I hate lazy fucks.

(11-03-2011, 05:44 PM)Cracker Wrote: I fucking hate redistribution of wealth movements. Get a fucking job. If you don't make enough, get a fucking education.

Or better still, become a "too big to fail" banker and get filthy, stinking rich, knowing that if you engage in high-risk gambling, any losses incurred will be covered by the "house".

(11-04-2011, 06:19 AM)cannongal Wrote: The other day I caught a program on one of the 24 hour news channels. It mentioned a new group called the 53%. This group is against the occupy movement, and according to http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/26/news/eco.../index.htm

The number originates in the estimate that roughly 47% of Americans don't pay federal income tax, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. The 53 percenters stress the fact that they are paying the taxes that support the government assistance the protesters say they want.

There are quite a few articles about about the 53, Here's another:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/201...ont-whine/

You do know that Josh Treviño is a political strategist, do you not?

(11-04-2011, 07:12 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(11-03-2011, 05:44 PM)Cracker Wrote: I fucking hate redistribution of wealth movements. Get a fucking job. If you don't make enough, get a fucking education.

Or better still, become a "too big to fail" banker and get filthy, stinking rich, knowing that if you engage in high-risk gambling, any losses incurred will be covered by the "house".

No, I think it is way better to be poor and powerless. Yes, that is the way to go. Then you have nothing to lose, not even your dignity.

Who do you think feeds those fucking people? Try the "house."

Your point sucks. You should think things out better.

In case you decide to turn to facts to support your retardedness, start here: http://www.federalbudget.com/ You'll see poor people suck up more money than anything else. You will see how stupid you have been...

Stupid is a powerful and derogatory term, I like to use ignorant as many people are smart but maybe short circuited in the brain temporarily, until reality sets in.

Envious would be the best term to describe them. Slaves bitch about what the master has. Trash bitch about the middle class. Complete retards Occupy Toledo and Atlanta.

That is stupid and lazy. Worry about what you have, not what you want to take from someone else.

Better yet, if you don't like banking, don't borrow any fucking money. Cash your checks at Kroger and don't buy stuff you can't afford and don't need. Don't be a consumer. Much better than being a pain in the ass whiner.

I think they forget that Communists actually have to WORK for little compensation. Once they figure that out, they will go home...

Why people think Communism and Socialism is better amazes me. I know a guy in N.Y. that became an electrician and is all up in the unions ass. He is the laziest fuck I ever meet and always says he would love to let Communism become reality. A smart guy that back in the late 60's walked down the aisle in a church on Sunday high on L.S.D. screaming about the falacy of religion.
He never will amount to anything but I know his I.Q. is at at least 140 Math and old war battles are his specialty and could tell you anything in an instant about any war in the past 4000 yrs.
He is still an asshole though, that will never change no matter how smart he is.

(11-04-2011, 07:55 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(11-04-2011, 07:12 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(11-03-2011, 05:44 PM)Cracker Wrote: I fucking hate redistribution of wealth movements. Get a fucking job. If you don't make enough, get a fucking education.

Or better still, become a "too big to fail" banker and get filthy, stinking rich, knowing that if you engage in high-risk gambling, any losses incurred will be covered by the "house".

No, I think it is way better to be poor and powerless. Yes, that is the way to go. Then you have nothing to lose, not even your dignity.

Who do you think feeds those fucking people? Try the "house."

Your point sucks. You should think things out better.

The federal gov't spent about 860 billion on unemployment benefits, welfare and medicaid in fiscal year 2010.

The bailout of financial institutions exceeds 13 trillion and is the largest redistribution of wealth to have ever occurred.

See the irony of saps like you hatin' on the poor for costing taxpayers billions, while turning a blind eye to the excesses of the richest of the rich, who steal trillions?

I sure do.


http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/what-...means/5149

http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/pre...p1150.aspx

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/0...inessearly

http://usawatchdog.com/global-financial-...atchdog%29

The only legitimate complaint I've heard from the OWS folks is that the banks should have done more to renegotiate mortgages. I see that in hindsight.

I still think that idiots who took out adjustable rate mortgages that they couldn't afford were just that...idiots. Still, with the federal lending rates so low, some of the big banks could/should have done more to help people stay in their homes.

(11-04-2011, 07:12 PM)rothschild Wrote: Or better still, become a "too big to fail" banker and get filthy, stinking rich, knowing that if you engage in high-risk gambling, any losses incurred will be covered by the "house".

That is just ridiculous to me. Do you think your local B of A teller is getting stinking rich? Should everyone that works for Wells Fargo pay the price for a few? And WHERE was federal oversight prior to the housing burst?

There are several regulatory bodies that SHOULD have seen what was happening before it happened. It's like blaming your 2 year old child for running in traffic--when you were busy doing something else.

(11-04-2011, 08:56 PM)rothschild Wrote: The federal gov't spent about 860 billion on unemployment benefits, welfare and medicaid in fiscal year 2010.

The bailout of financial institutions exceeds 13 trillion and is the largest redistribution of wealth to have ever occurred.

See the irony of saps like you hatin' on the poor for costing taxpayers billions, while turning a blind eye to the excesses of the richest of the rich, who steal trillions?

I sure do.

I don't turn a blind eye, I just don't borrow money if I can help it. I have a mortgage and that's about it. I do have credit cards for emergencies, but I don't use them to buy crap I don't need. I am not the bank's bitch.

You whine like a punk and blame the government instead of blaming the people who bought houses they KNEW they couldn't afford. If nobody borrowed money, banks wouldn't have control over their lives.

The bailouts are LOANS that have to paid back. You think Shanequa is going to pay back the medicaid and welfare? You don't understand the difference between borrowing money and living off taxpayer charity.

Dumbass.

A lot of the money has already been REPAID and the US made a profit. Are you going to repay the benefits Jose and his seven kids used? If not, STFU.

Who received the most money in all the bailout programs? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. What are those? Government Sponsored Enterprises. Yeah, government. Fannie Mae was formed during the Great Depression and created, CREATED, the second-mortgage industry. They were formed so POOR PEOPLE could buy homes and they are one of the main reasons the mortgage industry tanked. Why? Because of poor people not paying for their shit.

So, rothschild, you are bitching about poor people when you bitch about the bailouts. You have no fucking idea what you are talking about. I do blame banks for handing out money to people who couldn't afford to borrow it, but the GOVERNMENT told them to and backed it up. Now we all have to pay for that shit because some people in our society can't fucking take care of themselves.

You think all the money we pay is going to rich people? That is a fucking laugh. Rich people try not to put in too much because they know where it is going, but they pay a shitload more than poor people (ZERO). I wish I didn't have to pay for all the fucking losers, too.


The problems with our economy are based on the rest of us having to pay for other people. The government thinks it can solve this problem by taking our money without our permission and giving it to those people. We give them the chance to buy homes and cars and go to college. Then we are stuck with their debt AND their recurring monthly benefit payments. We have now reached critical mass. There is no way we can pay for all the fucking poor people (there are generations of them who we have allowed to reproduce, like rats) with the money from the middle class. So now we are turning the middle class into poor people because we take too fucking much from them. Why should half of my paycheck be FUCKING GONE before I get it? When did that become OK? WTF people? Why do we allow the losers to do this to us? Why do we let our government MAKE US pay for people who won't work and won't keep their legs closed?

Jesus it makes me mad as hell.

Now the Occupy Atlanta group is suing the city because they didn't get to break the rules and stay in the park after 11 PM. I can't stay at the park then, why should they get to?

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/occupy-a...17965.html

They blame the banks for the foreclosures, but yet, they aren't at fucking work so they have money to pay their own mortgage. How can ANYBODY get sucked into that endless circle of stupidity? Poor people borrow bank money because the government made new rules, poor people don't pay the mortgage, banks foreclose, and poor people DARE bitch about it? Why? Because they want something for FREE that the 53% of us pay for because there is NO FREE anything. Dirty fuckers.

Why aren't they Occupying the front lawn of the White House? That is who sold them the dream that they could work at McDonald's, or not work at all, and buy a mansion.

WAKE UP! I don't want to pay for your lazy ass, I have kids of MY OWN who deserve my paycheck. Holy shit, what the hell is wrong with the millions and millions and millions of fucked up people? Pay for your OWN shit. YOU do it. NOT Cracker.

I'll never understand why some people find that such a difficult concept to grasp. Handle your own bullshit...and seriously, who the fuck buys something they know damn well they can't afford? That's just plain old shit for brains. If I use poor money management skills no one is going to jump in & bail my stupid ass out. If you bought a home you can't afford & you lose it, I don't have an ounce of sympathy for you, I think you're a fuckin' retard.

(11-05-2011, 07:23 AM)Duchess Wrote:

If I use poor money management skills no one is going to jump in & bail my stupid ass out.

Exactly. They would laugh and say you deserved it even though you earned all your own money.

Keep biting the hands that feed you, poor people, and see if it doesn't turn decent people into crooks. I will eventually get sick of paying taxes used mostly for you and will figure out how to lessen my burden.

I was going to do the math and see how much less I have to earn to bring home the same amount and not owe taxes. This climate does not make me want to earn more. I stopped working two jobs for this exact reason, they took almost my entire second paycheck in taxes extra last year and the year before. I'm not doing that shit anymore.

(11-04-2011, 07:37 PM)rothschild Wrote: You do know that Josh Treviño is a political strategist, do you not?

And this matters, because????

I really could give a shit what he does for a living, at least he has a fucking job, and he's not holding his hand out expecting others to support him while he sits around playing video games all day.

For these Occupy people to say they represent 99% of the people in the country is ridiculous. I'm not rich by any means, I've been working since I was 14, never took a handout, not wic, medicaid, food stamps any of it. I was raised to believe you don't get something for nothing, and to be appreciative of what I have instead of wanting more all the time.

A good chunk of people these days believe that someone else should provide for them, and I'm sick and tired busting my ass for 40 hours a week while the twat that lives down the street pops out kid after kid and brags about getting $600.00 worth of food stamps and over a thousand dollars in state assistance every month. She doesn't have time to get a job, but for some reason she's got the time to stand on a street corner holding a sign that says 'Occupy NH', Not to mention that during tax time, she gets around $8000.00, but has never worked a day in her life, but hell, she laughs all the way to the bank every month~damn baby making twat.

I like the premise behind the 53% statement, why the hell should my taxes go to someone like her-6 kids with 5 different fathers and none of 'em pay child support.

I have an 83 YO neighbor who eats ¹⁄₂ pack of Ramen 5 nights a week, because S.S. doesn't pay enough to cover his monthly expenses, and food stamps gives him a whole $58.00 a month. Poor guy worked his ass off for 60 years, just so he can eat Ramen every night, meanwhile the twat down the street has Lobster and steak every night.

The system is fucked up, and OWS wants to fuck it up even more. Do you really want to be dependent on the government for everything? I sure as hell don't.

Someone in Chicago dumped 1000 Mcdonalds applications on the protesters.............They in turn tried to get the people that did it arrested for littering.

Nearly all of the FTSE 100 companies evade or avoid paying taxes. It costs the UK economy more than welfare and immigration combined.

Only the super rich have the ability to take advantage of tax loopholes and evade/avoid paying taxes.

But retards would still rather blame the weakest in society for all of societies ills because thats the easiest thing to do, its just plain deluded and lazy.

(11-05-2011, 09:56 AM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: Nearly all of the FTSE 100 companies evade or avoid paying taxes. It costs the UK economy more than welfare and immigration combined.

Only the super rich have the ability to take advantage of tax loopholes and evade/avoid paying taxes.

But retards would still rather blame the weakest in society for all of societies ills because thats the easiest thing to do, its just plain deluded and lazy.

Productivity -V- dependency

Do you know what an earned income tax credit is? of course you do, It's a tax loophole.

One that allows people who paid zero tax to claim a certian amount of income that allows them to recieve a tax refund from the government.

(11-05-2011, 09:56 AM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: But retards would still rather blame the weakest in society for all of societies ills because thats the easiest thing to do, its just plain deluded and lazy.

And who do you consider the weakest in society to be? Do you think our welfare recipients over here are weak, because I sure as hell don't. Minimum wage in this state is $7.25 per hour, someone working 40 hrs/wk grosses roughly about $1100 to $1200 per month, which is a lot less than Susie babymaker gets to stay home and spread her legs all day.

That person that works 40 hours at a minimum wage doesn't qualify for food stamps or medicaid, because he actually works for a living. What makes you think that people living on welfare are going to go out and get a job? If they do, they lose all the 'free' benefits they can get for doing absolutely nothing.