Trying to go line-by-line on that original post and pointing out where it's exaggeration, hyperbole, or just plain baiting would be like wading through a river of shit and trying to point out which chunks smelled the worst. You don't have "facts" you have ill-formed grudges against seemingly everyone who isn't exactly like you and essentially fabricated accusations. You pair unrelated and sometimes isolated incidents together and try to imply that somehow one causes the other or that those cases are the universal truth. Frankly arguing the finer points would waste both our times: mine for thinking, yours for whatever it is you do in place of thinking.

(05-28-2012, 08:30 AM)Donovan Wrote: Trying to go line-by-line on that original post and pointing out where it's exaggeration, hyperbole, or just plain baiting would be like wading through a river of shit and trying to point out which chunks smelled the worst. You don't have "facts" you have ill-formed grudges against seemingly everyone who isn't exactly like you and essentially fabricated accusations. You pair unrelated and sometimes isolated incidents together and try to imply that somehow one causes the other or that those cases are the universal truth. Frankly arguing the finer points would waste both our times: mine for thinking, yours for whatever it is you do in place of thinking.

Fuck off you whiny excuse making bitch.

you can't do it because each is real and each has supporting documentation.

all you have is deflection and bullshit, enjoy your breakfast.

(05-28-2012, 07:23 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Well Bill Mahr is cool also.

I like Bill. I think he sits firmly in the middle & finds fault with both parties equally.

(05-28-2012, 08:33 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(05-28-2012, 07:23 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Well Bill Mahr is cool also.

I like Bill. I think he sits firmly in the middle & finds fault with both parties equally.

Then why did he only give obama a million dollars?

If he was in the middle wouldn't he have given both candidates a million dollars?

(05-27-2012, 11:40 PM)IMaDick Wrote:

(05-27-2012, 11:24 PM)Donovan Wrote:

(05-27-2012, 02:39 PM)Duchess Wrote:

What do you suggest the average American do?

For starters, require media outlets like Faux News to be held accountable for the fearmongering that confuses simple folk like Dick into thinking his list is an accurate depiction of life in the USA.

And the liberal agenda that convinces Donoboy everything is peachy and none of the things I listed actually happened, even though we have discussed some of them here, from differing news sources other than fox news.

Now just in case you missed it, does it really matter where the story comes from if it's accurate?

Or would you rather eat the mile long string of shit Donoboy tried to bullshit you with?

It really does matter where the story comes from. Just posting in this forum you're required to give sources for your material something you ignored in your OP. Not a single source, that means it's either your opinion or conjecture.

You're the kind of person that thinks if you repeat something enough it becomes truth whether it actually is or not.

I don't know anything about that so I can't respond in an enlightened manner.

(05-28-2012, 08:39 AM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote:

(05-27-2012, 11:40 PM)IMaDick Wrote:

(05-27-2012, 11:24 PM)Donovan Wrote:

(05-27-2012, 02:39 PM)Duchess Wrote:

What do you suggest the average American do?

For starters, require media outlets like Faux News to be held accountable for the fearmongering that confuses simple folk like Dick into thinking his list is an accurate depiction of life in the USA.

And the liberal agenda that convinces Donoboy everything is peachy and none of the things I listed actually happened, even though we have discussed some of them here, from differing news sources other than fox news.

Now just in case you missed it, does it really matter where the story comes from if it's accurate?

Or would you rather eat the mile long string of shit Donoboy tried to bullshit you with?

It really does matter where the story comes from. You're the kind of person that thinks if you repeat something enough it becomes truth whether it actually is or not.

Donoboy, your support personal are just as stupid as you are, WTF is up with that?

(05-28-2012, 08:39 AM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote: You're the kind of person that thinks if you repeat something enough it becomes truth whether it actually is or not.

Sounds kinda like religion, no?

(05-28-2012, 08:44 AM)crash Wrote:

(05-28-2012, 08:39 AM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote: You're the kind of person that thinks if you repeat something enough it becomes truth whether it actually is or not.

Sounds kinda like religion, no?

Or the liberal agenda.

The rich need to pay their fair share.


The rich need to pay their fair share.

The rich need to pay their fair share.

The rich need to pay their fair share.


can you tell me what the truth is about how much the Rich pay now?

Can you tell me what the percentage is of people who pay taxes as opposed to those who really don't pay anything?

If not you're probably not in the right conversation,or at least on the wrong side of the conversation.

(05-28-2012, 08:32 AM)IMaDick Wrote:

(05-28-2012, 08:30 AM)Donovan Wrote: Trying to go line-by-line on that original post and pointing out where it's exaggeration, hyperbole, or just plain baiting would be like wading through a river of shit and trying to point out which chunks smelled the worst. You don't have "facts" you have ill-formed grudges against seemingly everyone who isn't exactly like you and essentially fabricated accusations. You pair unrelated and sometimes isolated incidents together and try to imply that somehow one causes the other or that those cases are the universal truth. Frankly arguing the finer points would waste both our times: mine for thinking, yours for whatever it is you do in place of thinking.

Fuck off you whiny excuse making bitch.

you can't do it because each is real and each has supporting documentation.

all you have is deflection and bullshit, enjoy your breakfast.

Post your sources then, or shut the fuck up. You're getting tragically owned in this exchange.

My state thinks if you make over $250,000.00 you're rich.

(05-28-2012, 08:49 AM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote: Post your sources then, or shut the fuck up. You're getting tragically owned in this exchange.

Because you say so?

So far I started the topic, if you want to dispute what I posted then post your sources and your contradictory information or shut up.

Or you can continue making an ass out of yourself? Your choice of course.

Let's go ahead and start over.

Nidal Hasan

match the name to the quote from my original post for 20 points.

My father eats, sleeps, lives and breathes fox news. I turn it off when I go over there. I'm afraid he's turning into one of those crazy political zealots. I never watch fox news or cnn or anything. Those people are, at the heart of it, reporters and will skew stories to their favor, meaning they leave stuff out, take shit out of context or straight out lie. Its hardly informative and sometimes scary.

(05-28-2012, 09:53 AM)LuciferLynn Wrote: My father eats, sleeps, lives and breathes fox news. I turn it off when I go over there. I'm afraid he's turning into one of those crazy political zealots. I never watch fox news or cnn or anything. Those people are, at the heart of it, reporters and will skew stories to their favor, meaning they leave stuff out, take shit out of context or straight out lie. Its hardly informative and sometimes scary.

Not everyone is weak minded, some people pick through the shit to find what little bit of truth is there.

Others just buy whatever their handlers tell them and are more than happy to pass that shit around like it's truth.

You can easily spot those people when they post crap or tell someone else they are messed up but refuse to dispute the facts with anything other than bullshit, or personal insults.

ah you mean like you've been doing all through this thread?

Point taken.

(05-28-2012, 10:20 AM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote: ah you mean like you've been doing all through this thread?

Point taken.

Nadal Hasan

Please match the name with the correct quote from my first post.

20 points to the one who can do it.

(05-28-2012, 09:53 AM)LuciferLynn Wrote: My father eats, sleeps, lives and breathes fox news. I turn it off when I go over there. I'm afraid he's turning into one of those crazy political zealots. I never watch fox news or cnn or anything. Those people are, at the heart of it, reporters and will skew stories to their favor, meaning they leave stuff out, take shit out of context or straight out lie. Its hardly informative and sometimes scary.

My mother always has Fox news on too. I hate discussing politics with her. She HATES Obama and Hilary. She was convinced that I voted for Obama and was pissed at me. FTR I did not vote for Obama. I pretty much hate politics because I think they are all crooks and liars. I am a registered Republican but I try to educate myself on all the candidates and choose the best one regardless of party.

Something about Obama came on TV the other day and my son says "Hey Obeezy!! Wassup my nigga?" After I laughed my ass off because he sounded so funny saying that I asked him where he came up with that. He said Andrew's Dad. Andrew is black and his parents think Obama has done a horrible job as president.

Happy Memorial Day to all the Vets of Mock. Thanks for all you do/done.

Quote:IMaDICK posted: A Muslim officer crying "Allah Akbar" while shooting up an army base is considered to have committed "Workplace Violence" while an American citizen boasting a Ron Paul bumper sticker is classified as a "Domestic Terrorist".

Ok, Dick. I'll take a shot at the 20 points.

This first item in your OP refers to the fact that Holder chose not to charge Hasan with domestic terrorism despite proven communications and ties with an Al Qaeda leader. Meanwhile at the same time back in 2009 the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) issued a report indicating that Libertarians (particularly followers of Ron Paul, Barr, and Baldwin) should be viewed as potential domestic terrorists/militia members.

Had the decisions/conclusions regarding the two separate and unrelated issues of Hasan's charges and Libertarian classifications come from the same source, it would be thoroughly hypocritical and more disturbing, imo. As it stands, two unrelated topics, imo.

FWIW, I believe that Hasan should be charged with domestic terrorism, based on the publicly released evidence to date - particularly his many communications with al-Awlaki prior to the attack, and I disagree with the MIAC report conclusions regarding Libertarians (ridiculous).