(06-04-2018, 07:32 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: It’s the White House, you go.

I wanted to come back and rub this in a little. Like trump supporters everywhere you are in the minority with this train of thought. My team is getting accolades from across the country. The fucking president of the United States said if all the kids don't come to my party I don't want any of them to come, so stay away. Waaaah.

...and just to be perfectly fucking clear, not a single Eagle sat or took a knee in 2017 during the national anthem, nor did any of them stay in the locker room. The president lied. Again.

I cannot remember a time when my ethnicity was asked when I voted, good point.

Well, if you guys want to believe that the Pew post-election voter analysis (which often reflects meaningful differences from the early projections and exit poll surveys) does not provide an accurate enough depiction -- in order to support your narrative that Latinos support Trump due to his hard-line stance on immigration, or for whatever reason -- that's your prerogative.

The Pew analysis showed that Trump got a much higher percentage of the Latino vote than projected by pre-election polls and media pundits.

And, the total votes cast is stagnant, not variable. So, if Trump got millions of more Latino votes than the post-election data analysis indicates, that means he's wrongly being credited with millions of votes from some other demographic.

Now state TV is showing pix of some of my players praying before a game, they do it every week, some of them are in the same bible study group, and Fox is presenting it as proof of them disrespecting the flag. Cocksuckas. Their brain dead audience will buy it.

(06-05-2018, 10:23 AM)Duchess Wrote: Now state TV is showing pix of some of my players praying before a game, they do it every week, some of them are in the same bible study group, and Fox is presenting it as proof of them disrespecting the flag. Cocksuckas. Their brain dead audience will buy it.

As Trump told Jerry Jones, "this is a winning issue" for the president with his core base. It riles them up and rallies them behind him. That's who he and FOX are targeting with this bullshit, especially the white nationalist element, in my opinion.

Trump made history when he publicly disinvited the Golden State Warriors to the White House after they won the NBA championship last year. Now it's the Eagles.

After winning the title, Steph Curry made a remark indicating he wasn't sure if he was gonna go to the White House considering Trump's attacks on blacks athletes silently protesting.

Warriors coach Steve Kerr said that while he disagrees with Trump's stance on many issues, he felt that respecting the White House was important and the team was meeting to determine issues they could discuss with Trump during the visit.

FOX & Friends then reported on Steph's remark and.......................you guessed it, immediately thereafter Trump tweeted that the Warriors weren't welcome.

The team instead took students from DC schools to celebrate and learn at the African American History and Culture Museum.

If the Cleveland Cavaliers win the title this year, don't expect them to get an invite considering LeBron James' comments on Trump's interference into professional sports and his attacks on some athletes. That would sure be an interesting meet up though.

(06-05-2018, 09:55 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, if you guys want to believe that the Pew post-election voter analysis (which often reflects meaningful differences from the early projections and exit poll surveys) does not provide an accurate enough depiction -- in order to support your narrative that Latinos support Trump due to his hard-line stance on immigration, or for whatever reason -- that's your prerogative.

The Pew analysis showed that Trump got a much higher percentage of the Latino vote than projected by pre-election polls and media pundits.

And, the total votes cast is stagnant, not variable. So, if Trump got millions of more Latino votes than the post-election data analysis indicates, that means he's wrongly being credited with millions of votes from some other demographic.

Are they the ones that predicted a Clinton win?

(06-05-2018, 10:23 AM)Duchess Wrote: Now state TV is showing pix of some of my players praying before a game, they do it every week, some of them are in the same bible study group, and Fox is presenting it as proof of them disrespecting the flag. Cocksuckas. Their brain dead audience will buy it.

I just saw the story and Chris Long's response to FOX News.

Imagine wanting to please the boss so very badly that you run stills of guys knelt down PRAYING during pregame -- not one Eagles player knelt for the anthem this yr. Keep carrying [Trump's] water to sow division while misrepresenting Christian men. Aren't many of your viewers.. nevermind.' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...otest.html

FOX has since issued a statement saying that it was an 'error'.

Good for Long!

(06-05-2018, 10:46 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Trump made history when he publicly disinvited the Golden State Warriors to the White House after they won the NBA championship last year. Now it's the Eagles.

I remember that!

The White House has now changed their story. They say the Eagles weren't welcome because they were going to do a bait & switch so they could humiliate the prez and the WH. FFS!

(06-05-2018, 12:07 PM)Maggot Wrote:

(06-05-2018, 09:55 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, if you guys want to believe that the Pew post-election voter analysis (which often reflects meaningful differences from the early projections and exit poll surveys) does not provide an accurate enough depiction -- in order to support your narrative that Latinos support Trump due to his hard-line stance on immigration, or for whatever reason -- that's your prerogative.

The Pew analysis showed that Trump got a much higher percentage of the Latino vote than projected by pre-election polls and media pundits.

And, the total votes cast is stagnant, not variable. So, if Trump got millions of more Latino votes than the post-election data analysis indicates, that means he's wrongly being credited with millions of votes from some other demographic.

Are they the ones that predicted a Clinton win?

Read the very post you quoted Maggot. It answers your question.

(06-05-2018, 12:10 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Good for Long!

Chris Long is the cat's ass. He's active in the community, like many on my team are. Last year he donated his entire game checks for the year to charity for education equality. His message is positive and one of unity.

hmmmmm. I need to go to your school and learn to read between the lines a little better.

(06-05-2018, 12:12 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:

(06-05-2018, 12:07 PM)Maggot Wrote:

(06-05-2018, 09:55 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, if you guys want to believe that the Pew post-election voter analysis (which often reflects meaningful differences from the early projections and exit poll surveys) does not provide an accurate enough depiction -- in order to support your narrative that Latinos support Trump due to his hard-line stance on immigration, or for whatever reason -- that's your prerogative.

The Pew analysis showed that Trump got a much higher percentage of the Latino vote than projected by pre-election polls and media pundits. They also predicted that Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 election.

And, the total votes cast is stagnant, not variable. So, if Trump got millions of more Latino votes than the post-election data analysis indicates, that means he's wrongly being credited with millions of votes from some other demographic.

Are they the ones that predicted a Clinton win?

Read the very post you quoted Maggot. It answers your question.

Ok I see it now............Thanks!

Clever shit, Mags.

No one disputes that almost all the pre-election polls had Hillary Clinton winning just before election day (though not by a long shot, as Biggie contended). Most of the forecasters got it wrong. That's an established fact which we've known for a year and a half.

But, thanks for invoking your Hillary Clinton obsession into my comment because you asked a stupid question to which the answer appeared multiple times in the post you quoted.

The Pew analysis on voter demographics, the source of the Latino voter % which was actually being disputed/ discussed, was not part of the pre-election forecasts.

(06-04-2018, 07:52 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:

(06-04-2018, 07:50 PM)Duchess Wrote:

Oh...my...gawd. You're trump! Ewwwww *spits*

Am not!!

For the record, calling HotD Trump is WAY worse than me calling her a tranny or HotDog.

(06-05-2018, 01:06 PM)Donovan Wrote: For the record, calling HotD Trump is WAY worse than me calling her a tranny or HotDog.

I know! I know! I was horrified to realize she had slipped right in there and I had inadvertently responded to her. Ohmaigawds. She's one of my girl crushes, I would never knowingly refer to her as trump. *spits*

Well she does have weird eyebrows.

I can totally see Duchess making the evil eye sign like an old gypsy woman when she says "Trump".

(06-05-2018, 02:16 PM)sally Wrote: Well she does have weird eyebrows.

Hey, at this point, my eyebrows are my best feature.

It's funny to me when anybody, including myself, doesn't know the words to songs they're singing in public.

Given the context of this presidential display at today's "No Eagles!" event, I can't stop laughing.



Hilarious. The head bopping is classic.

He's such a dipshit. Obama would be like I don't know this song and I'm not even fucking trying.