(11-20-2021, 05:17 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-19-2021, 10:26 PM)sally Wrote:

(11-05-2021, 10:27 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-05-2021, 07:19 AM)rothschild Wrote: he not only defended his own life, he probably saved other lives, too. The man's a hero

Without a doubt, you are one of the most revolting people that I've ever had the misfortune of "meeting", and that's sayin' something given what a hellscape the internet is.

I've not paid much attention to this case, but I just read that one of the guys he killed was a convicted sex offender with 11 counts of rape on children from age 5 to 11. Is this true? It seems all of the people he shot were scum of the earth. Since you're defending them you may not have any business calling others revolting.

Says the person who thinks Hitler was on to something. 

I don't think I've ever looked up the background on those who have been killed to see if their murders have been justified. 

If you think the media is a better judge of guilt/innocence than the judiciary, why do you bother pretending to care about democracy?

(11-20-2021, 12:10 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(11-20-2021, 05:17 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-19-2021, 10:26 PM)sally Wrote:

(11-05-2021, 10:27 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-05-2021, 07:19 AM)rothschild Wrote: he not only defended his own life, he probably saved other lives, too. The man's a hero

Without a doubt, you are one of the most revolting people that I've ever had the misfortune of "meeting", and that's sayin' something given what a hellscape the internet is.

I've not paid much attention to this case, but I just read that one of the guys he killed was a convicted sex offender with 11 counts of rape on children from age 5 to 11. Is this true? It seems all of the people he shot were scum of the earth. Since you're defending them you may not have any business calling others revolting.

Says the person who thinks Hitler was on to something. 

I don't think I've ever looked up the background on those who have been killed to see if their murders have been justified. 

If you think the media is a better judge of guilt/innocence than the judiciary, why do you bother pretending to care about democracy?

Why do you think my opinion is that the media is a better judge of guilt/innocent?

(11-20-2021, 12:21 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-20-2021, 12:10 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(11-20-2021, 05:17 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-19-2021, 10:26 PM)sally Wrote:

(11-05-2021, 10:27 AM)Duchess Wrote: Without a doubt, you are one of the most revolting people that I've ever had the misfortune of "meeting", and that's sayin' something given what a hellscape the internet is.

I've not paid much attention to this case, but I just read that one of the guys he killed was a convicted sex offender with 11 counts of rape on children from age 5 to 11. Is this true? It seems all of the people he shot were scum of the earth. Since you're defending them you may not have any business calling others revolting.

Says the person who thinks Hitler was on to something. 

I don't think I've ever looked up the background on those who have been killed to see if their murders have been justified. 

If you think the media is a better judge of guilt/innocence than the judiciary, why do you bother pretending to care about democracy?

Why do you think my opinion is that the media is a better judge of guilt/innocent?

Because murder is a crime, whereas the verdict is that there was no crime committed by the defendant: but more importantly, the court proceedings demonstrated very clearly that the prosecutors were dishonest and malicious, which we saw from Grosskreutz's testimony, who acknowledged that he provoked Rittenhouse, and that he was concerned for his safety because he was being assaulted. They expected him to lie, but he couldn't do that when he was presented with photographic evidence of his actions. There are a great many other examples of prosecutorial malice and deception, as well.

The media doesn't form my opinions for me, rothschild. I search out information from a variety of sources in an effort to make an informed opinion. For example, just the other day Cars posted a picture of the price of gas at the pumps, I wanted more information on gas prices across the country and how it's affecting people, that's when I discovered that picture is 9-10 years old. As you well know, not all sources are legitimate and when I want to know more I look for information.

(11-20-2021, 01:56 PM)Duchess Wrote: The media doesn't form my opinions for me, rothschild. I search out information from a variety of sources in an effort to make an informed opinion. For example, just the other day Cars posted a picture of the price of gas at the pumps, I wanted more information on gas prices across the country and how it's affecting people, that's when I discovered that picture is 9-10 years old. As you well know, not all sources are legitimate and when I want to know more I look for information.

OK, so how many of those sources are outside of the corporate ecosystem that tags everything it disagrees with as "misinformation"?

I'd like to go on record saying that black people have been, and frequently are, victimized by the same prosecutorial prejudice I just referenced in the Rittenhouse prosecution, with the main difference being that blacks almost always are relying on public defenders, who are worse than useless when you are charged with serious felonies. Is that racism? Yes, but not exclusively: class, IMO, is a larger factor, because poor whites get reamed out by this system just as frequently, *statistically* -- what skews the numbers so dramatically is that blacks are statistically much poorer, historically. As the middle class is being liquidated this is being evened out fairly quickly, but this is completely antithetical to "social justice" because the people who've primarily benefitted from racism, historically, are the self-proclaimed elites -- the very same group that is pushing and funding CRT in America. Which is ironic because when you look at how "police defunding" is playing out, poor blacks are getting screwed the worst because they live in the places that are hit the hardest, and cannot afford to relocate.

The Kid may be free, but his life will never be normal again. 
He needs to go into WITSEC if he wants to survive!

(11-21-2021, 12:04 AM)Carsman Wrote: The Kid may be free, but his life will never be normal again. 
He needs to go into WITSEC if he wants to survive!

His life hasn't changed yet, but it will next year when he settles with Wisconsin for false arrest and malicious prosecution. That will be the go ahead to sue the libturd press for libel and slander. Then his life will change forever.

'Merica

God fearing Christians. 

You think Floyd's a hero, you hate Rittenhouse because he stood up against people that fit the definition of terrorists.

Well, it's your lucky day, here's your new hero...

Hope you're happy, Duchess...

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/statu...4445801472

(11-22-2021, 01:02 PM)rothschild Wrote: You think Floyd's a hero, you hate Rittenhouse because he stood up against people that fit the definition of terrorists.

I think Floyd's a hero & I hate rittenhouse?   

It's unattractive to be so presumptuous with others you don't know, ma'am.

Look at some of the tweets this monster hasn't deleted yet. Her name is Mary Lemanski, a social media director for the Democratic Party in Illinois.

https://twitter.com/MaryLemanski/status/...ittenhouse

(11-22-2021, 01:39 PM)rothschild Wrote: Look at some of the tweets this monster hasn't deleted yet. 

Why?

(11-22-2021, 01:38 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-22-2021, 01:02 PM)rothschild Wrote: You think Floyd's a hero, you hate Rittenhouse because he stood up against people that fit the definition of terrorists.

I think Floyd's a hero & I hate rittenhouse?   

It's unattractive to be so presumptuous with others you don't know, ma'am.

All you do is rag on Trump and his followers. That's it. If you think that doesn't identify who and what you are you're IQ is probably the same as this latest "hero".

(11-22-2021, 01:42 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-22-2021, 01:39 PM)rothschild Wrote: Look at some of the tweets this monster hasn't deleted yet. 

Why?

Because you're socially liberal, and that wretched fool talks just like the liberal media heads. So why not take a good hard look at the shit you support?


https://twitter.com/MaryLemanski/status/...ittenhouse

There ya go being presumptuous again. Tsk Tsk.

(11-22-2021, 01:44 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(11-22-2021, 01:38 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(11-22-2021, 01:02 PM)rothschild Wrote: You think Floyd's a hero, you hate Rittenhouse because he stood up against people that fit the definition of terrorists.

I think Floyd's a hero & I hate rittenhouse?   

It's unattractive to be so presumptuous with others you don't know, ma'am.

All you do is rag on Trump and his followers. That's it. If you think that doesn't identify who and what you are you're IQ is probably the same as this latest "hero".

Oh rothschild. Practicing your armchair psychology?