+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Management and Newbie Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Introductions (https://mockforums.net/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: Hey everyone (/thread-7806.html)
RE: Hey everyone - Cracker - 04-26-2012
Eh, you like who you like. I like the rough boys. The PC lot and Internet White Knights are a dime a dozen. I need more stimulation than the self-congratulating, soft-handed BFFs provide.
RE: Hey everyone - Eat Shit And Die - 04-26-2012
*Looks at the carnage walks back out of thread.
RE: Hey everyone - Ilyanna - 04-27-2012
(04-26-2012, 08:05 PM)Duchess Wrote: Pushing the PI envelope with me only pisses me off & shows me that whoever is doing it has no real interest in being here, I have no qualms about sacrificing anyone at that point.[/i][/size]
Your board, your rules. I understand that.
Still, I probably dislike bans even more than you, so once again for clarity's sake, and as someone who knows all the parties involved: Riotgear was at no point doing any PI, and with PI, I mean linking somebody with their RL info or talking about previously undisclosed RL stuff of another poster.
I apologize for getting obnoxious so early in my time here. I am only addressing this again because while Riotgear can be called a lot of things, as far as I know him (and I do have known him for a while now), a PI troll he ain't.
(04-26-2012, 08:33 PM)Cracker Wrote: Eh, you like who you like. I like the rough boys. The PC lot and Internet White Knights are a dime a dozen. I need more stimulation than the self-congratulating, soft-handed BFFs provide.
Heh, same here. Gets me into trouble now and then, but damn if the fun isn't worth it
RE: Hey everyone - Duchess - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 06:48 AM)Ilyanna Wrote: Riotgear was at no point doing any PI, and with PI, I mean linking somebody with their RL info or talking about previously undisclosed RL stuff of another poster.
Riotgear can be called a lot of things, as far as I know him (and I do have known him for a while now), a PI troll he ain't.
I like RG & I expressed that to him personally, I even went so far as to tell him I thought he'd be a great addition to our site & that I appreciated his wit & humor. I was totally sincere in that.
What some are failing to take into consideration is that anything done outside of Mock is not relevant to me. I never consider how things are done on other sites nor do I care what goes down outside of Mock. There wouldn't be an issue had Ma registered using his real name & people referred to him as that, however, that's not what occurred, he choose to be "anonymous" even though others knew damn well who he is, that should have been a clue that he didn't want his name associated with this site nor used when he was being addressed in here.
RE: Hey everyone - Duchess - 04-27-2012
(04-26-2012, 07:30 PM)Cracker Wrote: Do something like send a volley of PMs like a punk ass bitch?
(04-26-2012, 07:51 PM)username Wrote: Did you PM admin and suggest that Riot get banned?
Why would either one of you think that & why would you even consider I'd give credence to the crying complaints of any Member? No one ever pm's me complaining about a Member. I've been pretty fuckin' clear in making sure that one & all understand that if you are uncomfortable, remove yourself from the situation, that's what adults do, I am not hand holding anyone.
Don't make assumptions about me & why I do what I do, I can't imagine that would sit well with either one of you if the situation were reversed.
RE: Hey everyone - Ilyanna - 04-27-2012
While I think it is not always possible to separate 100%, I understand your stance reg. stuff from elsewhere. But that's the point - Ma had linked himself to his "other" name before anybody else did. Not anywhere else. On here. That's why I have a problem following your reasoning.
RE: Hey everyone - Ilyanna - 04-27-2012
Ah, whatever, I don't wanna drag this out longer than needed. It's cool.
RE: Hey everyone - Ma Huang Sor - 04-27-2012
(04-26-2012, 08:20 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Cracker has a gift. Two men who haven't been here long are already fighting for her attention.
Intoxicating bitch!
I like cracker.
RE: Hey everyone - Donovan - 04-27-2012
How's tho "op" going, Michael jack son is still dead?
RE: Hey everyone - Duchess - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 08:54 AM)Donovan Wrote: How's tho "op" going, Michael jack son is still dead?
RE: Hey everyone - Donovan - 04-27-2012
His words. Not mine. Just trying to be friendly. Lol I'll stop now...
RE: Hey everyone - Duchess - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 09:18 AM)Donovan Wrote: Lol I'll stop now...
Such an astute gentleman. That's wonderful to read, darling, given I'm on the verge of giving you what you're begging for.
Have a beautiful day.
RE: Hey everyone - JsMom - 04-27-2012
Here's an idea. 
RE: Hey everyone - Ma Huang Sor - 04-27-2012
I like the way you think. Can't 'til tomorrow though.....had a little surgery yesterday and have to wait for the wound to heal
It's all good though, I has some lemon haze (its orange though, go figure) which is quite tasty.
RE: Hey everyone - Donovan - 04-27-2012
Smooch for Duchess
RE: Hey everyone - HairOfTheDog - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 09:20 AM)Duchess Wrote: I'm on the verge of giving you what you're begging for.
I dreamt once about you saying these exacts words to me (in a much different context)...
RE: Hey everyone - Ma Huang Sor - 04-27-2012
^I'd pay to see that.
RE: Hey everyone - username - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 07:52 AM)Duchess Wrote: Why would either one of you think that & why would you even consider I'd give credence to the crying complaints of any Member?
Don't make assumptions about me & why I do what I do, I can't imagine that would sit well with either one of you if the situation were reversed.[/i][/size]
I don't believe that you would make a decision based on anyone pm'ing you but I'd fault someone for trying. That's all.
Meh, I'm over it but I agree with almost everything you've typed with regards to Riot and the decision to ban him (flaunting rules, the Hatfield and McCoy shit) but at the end of the day, I don't think using the name that shall not be mentioned should have been the straw that broke the camel's back (if it was).
JMO. Stating the obvious: your board, your call.
RE: Hey everyone - IMaDick - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 11:16 AM)username Wrote:(04-27-2012, 07:52 AM)Duchess Wrote: Why would either one of you think that & why would you even consider I'd give credence to the crying complaints of any Member?
Don't make assumptions about me & why I do what I do, I can't imagine that would sit well with either one of you if the situation were reversed.[/i][/size]
I don't believe that you would make a decision based on anyone pm'ing you but I'd fault someone for trying. That's all.
Meh, I'm over it but I agree with almost everything you've typed with regards to Riot and the decision to ban him (flaunting rules, the Hatfield and McCoy shit) but at the end of the day, I don't think using the name that shall not be mentioned should have been the straw that broke the camel's back (if it was).
JMO. Stating the obvious: your board, your call.
^^^^^^^^^
Meh, your non functioning brain,your post.
I wish we still had a newbie hell so I could suggest your being put back in it for a few days,weeks or months.
RE: Hey everyone - username - 04-27-2012
(04-27-2012, 11:23 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Meh, your non functioning brain,your post.
I wish we still had a newbie hell so I could suggest your being put back in it for a few days,weeks or months.
Your typical, useless input.
