The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.27 (Linux)
|
![]() |
WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Personal Member Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Some Honest Therapy (https://mockforums.net/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? (/thread-10342.html) |
RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-30-2013 Well I watched the video. What an offensive stupid bitch taking women back into the dark ages. She is not experimenting, she is trying to make a name for herself and draw attention to herself. I applaud that first guy who called the police on her. A brainless bimbo with no point. A pointless 'experiment'. Is she doing a thesis on approaching men in tacky clothes? She has humiliated and degraded herself, that is what she has achieved and drawn unsuspecting gullible males into her web. Grow a brain bitch. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-30-2013 Addit: Go fuck yourself instead Tard. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2013 Okay, aussie. I have a question for you, related to degradation. What if these two high school graduates aspire to become pediatricians and their families have no money for school. ![]() They have 3 options: 1. Work for minimum wage during the day, struggle to pay for a couple of classes per semester plus books (or have to take out sudent loans), and spend 5 years getting to their Bachelor's Degrees. OR 2. Work at the Gentlemen and Ladies Clubs (in revealing uniforms) as cocktail servers - making 5 times as much money in salary + tips, take 4 classes during the day per semester (paid in cash as they go), and earn their Bachelor's degrees in 2.5 years with no debt. OR 3. Scope out and hook up with rich partners to pay their ways. Is Option 1 the only viable option to avoid degradation, in your opinion? RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-31-2013 HoTD, ever heard of scholarships? Yes and if you have to work for minimum wage, do what you have to do. You do not need to degrade yourself to get there, ever (this is what the majority of the population does). With some of this shady shit, it comes back to bite them on the arse and ruins their careers that they spent so much money on. I can't see what your questions about study and prostitution have to do with her little 'experiment'. She is hardly an academic. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Cynical Ninja - 07-31-2013 (07-30-2013, 05:42 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: I've got an even better story than this one (because it ends with ACTUAL sex). And then you woke up alone as usual in a puddle of your own semen. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-31-2013 ![]() RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Duchess - 07-31-2013 I select option 2. Screw that minimum wage bs. I want more money & less time invested. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Cynical Ninja - 07-31-2013 Yeah I'd rather earn nice juicy tips working as a towel boy in Heinrichs gay sauna than work for minimum wage in Maccy Ds. As long as the clientele knew that it was fine to look at the English muffin but no touchy feely much to drongos disappointment. ![]() RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2013 (07-31-2013, 01:56 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: HoTD, ever heard of scholarships? Yes and if you have to work for minimum wage, do what you have to do. You do not need to degrade yourself to get there, ever (this is what the majority of the population does). With some of this shady shit, it comes back to bite them on the arse and ruins their careers that they spent so much money on. Why yes, my friend aussie, I have heard of scholarships. Not everybody qualifies for them and not all of them cover the majority of costs. There was no prostitution involved in any of the options, though I think option 3 comes closest (it comes close to some marital motivators too, so...). My questions relate to your judgment and condemnation of Andrea - I was jumping off of your strong reaction because it made me curious about your view of "degradation" and your assumptions about Andrea. "Degraded" is highly subjective You facetiously asked if Andrea was doing a thesis on approaching men while wearing tacky clothes. She looks fine to me, but how do you know Andrea's not an academic in reality? How do you know her little "experiment" wasn't an assignment for her human sexuality class or a paid gig for a research institute ? You don't. If she participated in the experiment for study / work, still degrading? IDK, aussie. I sure don't feel like the young woman in the OP participating in a social/sexual research experiment, with no physical contact involved, is taking me back into the dark ages or a threat to my right to vote or anything. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-31-2013 She is not doing any legitimate research or scientific 'experiment'. Her behaviour was nothing more than an antisocial offensive display of human behaviour at its worst. First of all, when you engage in research that includes an experiment, the first thing you must obtain from your participants is consent. Otherwise it is unethical and not legitimate, just like her experiment. It is seen as adverse and harmful to all included. Which is consequently was. It brought others into shame and disrepute and angered innocent members of the community. As a taxpayer you should be offended, because your taxpayer dollars were spent on the stupid bitch as law enforcement were called and there would be a cost associated with that too. There is nothing legitimate about that study. No academic institution would associate themselves with such a debarcle. If she is enrolled in any academic institution anywhere on the planet, I would expect that she would be expelled instantly.Then she can progress and ask people for real whether they want to have sex with her........for money. HoTD I am surprised at you, you don't need to be Gloria Steinem to see that she is degrading herself and misrepresenting women, more than that US women (she filmed it and now it's out there, this magnifies the effect). Men overseas see this sort of thing and think that all of you are like that. As for her outfit, doesn't speak class or style to me, she wasn't wearing Prada darling now was she? Cheap and nasty. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Duchess - 07-31-2013 You weren't amused by it at all, Aussie? I thought it was funny but then I'm not a very serious person. Hey Aussie, wanna fuck? ![]() RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-31-2013 (07-31-2013, 09:12 AM)Duchess Wrote: You weren't amused by it at all, Aussie? I thought it was funny but then I'm not a very serious person. I would be amused by it if it was funny, if there was some intellect and humour involved. It was crass, it was bland and tacky, just stupid. Look if she wants to go around propositioning men, she can knock herself out. But don't cry rape if some weirdo tracks her down. Its just plain dangerous too, sends a bad message. I love funny shit, always looking for a laugh, but the humour here is nil. (07-31-2013, 09:12 AM)Duchess Wrote: Hey Aussie, wanna fuck? You know what I would say if someone said that to me? I would say, how dare you even aspire to my level ![]() RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Duchess - 07-31-2013 Is that a no?! I've never been turned down before. How DARE you. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-31-2013 I thought it was a hypothetical, you lack a key ingredient. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Maggot - 07-31-2013 I just measured my banana......13 3⁄4 " it is huge! RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2013 (07-31-2013, 09:08 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: HoTD I am surprised at you, you don't need to be Gloria Steinem to see that she is degrading herself and misrepresenting women, more than that US women (she filmed it and now it's out there, this magnifies the effect). Men overseas see this sort of thing and think that all of you are like that. As for her outfit, doesn't speak class or style to me, she wasn't wearing Prada darling now was she? Cheap and nasty. ![]() After a couple of years of hanging out here together, it surprises me that you're surprised by me. I don't think it's shocking to learn that I don't care if Andrea is just a flirty little tart looking for the limelight. Or, a college student engaged in a project. Or, on assignment for work. Or, on the road to prostitution, one silly you-tube experiment at a time. I think you're just mad because your theory that "all men are dogs" was busted out for the whole world to see! Told you so. According to Ms. Andrea's ground-breaking experiment in the field of human sexuality, only half of men are dogs who will "stick it in anywhere if no one is looking"! I'd be surprised if you're any more of an advocate for equal rights for women than I. As long as it's consensual, those include not only the rights to work for equal pay, hold public office, and vote - but also the rights to be promiscuous, dress however we see fit, sell our bodies if we so desire, etc... You represent a bigger threat to women than Andrea, aussie. She isn't taking us back to the dark ages or making a mockery of women; she's just a silly young woman doing her own thing freely, for whatever reasons. You, on the other hand, are an educated woman who would have us in chastity belts and condemning other women who chose to have fun with and enjoy (or even profit from - gasp) their sexuality. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - aussiefriend - 07-31-2013 (07-31-2013, 09:37 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Oh you bad, you very bad. Michael Jackson bad. (07-31-2013, 09:37 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Or, a college student engaged in a project. She aint no student. A legitimate study on a legitimate project requires consent, even in the third world. She would need to inform the participants that she was conducting an experiment and ask would they mind being lab rats. She did not do that, therefore the experiment is disqualified and not legitimate. (07-31-2013, 09:37 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I think you're just mad because your theory that "all men are dogs" was busted out for the whole world to see! Told you so. According to Ms. Andrea's ground-breaking experiment in the field of human sexuality, only half of men are dogs who will "stick it in anywhere if no one is looking"! Oh my God HoTD, now you have really lost the plot. I think she is the dog exposed in this undertaking, not the men. She misrepresented herself to them. You are a bigger threat to women HoTD not me, because you are backing this loser, that puts you on her team. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Maggot - 07-31-2013 HOTD .....nonchalantly bursting bubbles while walking barefoot through the puckerbushes. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - sally - 07-31-2013 It was mildly amusing, the first guy was pretty funny. I don't see it any different than hidden camera/ practical joke shows like The Jamie Kennedy experiment or Jackass. RE: WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH ME? - Duchess - 07-31-2013 (07-31-2013, 09:50 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: Oh you bad, you very bad. Michael Jackson bad. ![]() |