+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Discussions, Opinions & Debate (https://mockforums.net/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: Assange (/thread-4556.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Assange - aussiefriend - 12-27-2010
That all sounds very interesting, but you need to back it up with facts. No offence. If that is true what you have said its not good, but you can't just say things like that without backup. Definately there might be some questions unanswered but without facts then how can it be proved?
I agree, there is something that dosent add up with JFK, but the information/facts has not come out surrounding it. I noticed in the footage when he was shot, he flew backwards like he got shot from the front, which is towards the area of the grassy knoll. Not from behind.
RE: Assange - cladking - 12-28-2010
(12-27-2010, 02:43 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: That all sounds very interesting, but you need to back it up with facts. No offence. If that is true what you have said its not good, but you can't just say things like that without backup. Definately there might be some questions unanswered but without facts then how can it be proved?
I agree, there is something that dosent add up with JFK, but the information/facts has not come out surrounding it. I noticed in the footage when he was shot, he flew backwards like he got shot from the front, which is towards the area of the grassy knoll. Not from behind.
This stuff is all a matter of public record and should be locatable by googling. Some of it wasn't very apparent until more recent years but the only thing really important is that Oswald just happened to work at the TBD for six months and just happened to have a high powered rifle with him the day Kennedy rode by. What are the odds.
Oswald just happened to have contacts high up in communist Cuba and trained as a sniper there. He just happened to have defected to the Soviet Union. What are the chances that he wasn't well known to J Edgar Hoover. He the only American to defect to Russia. This is convenient since anyone jumping to conclusions would tend to blame Russia or Castro who Kennedy repeatedly failed to assassinate. A lot of people and entities had motive. He was entangled in things he'd have best stayed clear of like Marylin Monroe. He was coming down on organized crime who had their hooks in everything. (even the Kennedy family might have had connections at that time). The military industrial complex couldn't have loved him much sibnce the war in Vietnam was hardly going at all. JFK was willing to engage in war just not at the cost of lots of American lives.
It's pretty ironic how it turned out with Hoover being a cross dresser and all. Who'da thunk it.
The press knew what was going on almost immediately but even covered up the travesty that was the Warren Commission. And Ford was rewarded with a presidency by the real powers.
There are a lot of things that don't add up because there were accessories before and after the fact. It's possible there were no shots from the grassy knoll but if Kennedy's brains weren't all over the place there would have been shots from the grassy knoll. This was well organized. Oswald knew too much.
RE: Assange - Maggot - 12-28-2010
I believe the tootsie pop commercial said it best when the owl stated that "The world may never know".
RE: Assange - username - 12-29-2010
(12-28-2010, 10:13 PM)Maggot Wrote: I believe the tootsie pop commercial said it best when the owl stated that "The world may never know".
How many licks does it take to get to the center of the tootsie pop..? Uh one, two, three......
RE: Assange - aussiefriend - 12-29-2010
I did know about Hoover being a cross dresser and gay. I think I saw that in a documentary. He had a lifelong male companion.
Why don't they leak the truth on JFK?
RE: Assange - Maggot - 12-29-2010
Define "They"
RE: Assange - aussiefriend - 12-30-2010
wikileaks people
RE: Assange - cladking - 12-31-2010
I don't know that it's definitely true that Hoover killed him even though he is strongly implicated. It would suggest that he had soime extremely high placed accessories before and after the fact. The old documents are gone so it would have to be piced together from secondary and tertiary sources. Much of the evidence was destroyed within minutes or hours of the crime. Most of the principles involved were dead in less than ten years and normal attrition has wiped out the rest.
If it really was Hoover then it's well known among almost everyone but the public. It's surprising this subject doesn't come up a lot more often though. It's more surprising that key facts aren't more widely known. The entire thing was very surreal and this might be because so much information was being suppressed by the media.
RE: Assange - aussiefriend - 01-05-2011
hey beautiful people, i know u love me and i love u back, i have had a few drinks nothing too quiet. a full on day at work with a toxic person. silly cow. whatever.
regarding the former posting, watching the whole thing on youtube in slow motion is a real eye opener.
RE: Assange - aussiefriend - 01-05-2011
hey, i think assange is a hottie ha! will i be back to delete this later? i hope not.