The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.29 (Linux)
|
![]() |
WOULD YOU AGREE? - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Personal Member Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Some Honest Therapy (https://mockforums.net/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: WOULD YOU AGREE? (/thread-9113.html) |
RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - username - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 12:56 PM)Clang McFly Wrote: ME-OW! Shut up, Clang, you worthless turnip. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Clang McFly - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 01:07 PM)username Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:56 PM)Clang McFly Wrote: ME-OW! Shut up and take your menopause medication, you cranky, skanky snatch bitch. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - username - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 02:46 PM)Clang McFly Wrote:(10-26-2012, 01:07 PM)username Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:56 PM)Clang McFly Wrote: ME-OW! I am not menopausal!! ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Ilyanna - 10-26-2012 Hahaaa, Clang: 1, user:0 RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - FAHQTOO - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 12:26 PM)ramseycat Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:19 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: It seems to me you've been more than fair to many who've ended being clubbed with the ban hammer. I give you shit all the time and you don't call me SWEET!!! WTF??? Fuck you Ramsey...I'll never give you shit again!! RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Duchess - 10-26-2012 ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - username - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 03:18 PM)Ilyanna Wrote: Hahaaa, Clang: 1, user:0 Yeah, yeah. You only say that because he posts a lot at that ubber boring forum of yours. ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Ilyanna - 10-26-2012 Hehee, which one of them? ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - ramseycat - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 03:35 PM)FAHQTOO Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:26 PM)ramseycat Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:19 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: It seems to me you've been more than fair to many who've ended being clubbed with the ban hammer. Fine! You are the sweetest BITCH I know. Touchy ho. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - FAHQTOO - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 04:27 PM)ramseycat Wrote:(10-26-2012, 03:35 PM)FAHQTOO Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:26 PM)ramseycat Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:19 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: It seems to me you've been more than fair to many who've ended being clubbed with the ban hammer. That's much better. Just for that, I'll save this... ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - OnBendedKnee - 10-26-2012 (10-26-2012, 06:10 AM)Duchess Wrote: What you do here at MOCK regarding membership is not segregation. You're using the word incorrectly, even, "so to speak". RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Duchess - 10-27-2012 (10-26-2012, 10:40 PM)OnBendedKnee Wrote: What you do here at MOCK regarding membership is not segregation. Really? Segregation - the separation or isolation of a race, class, or ethnic group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social intercourse, by separate educational facilities, or by other discriminatory means. I discriminate against tards & those with a nigger attitude, not to mention low class assholes. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Sphincter Cop - 10-27-2012 (10-27-2012, 05:29 AM)Duchess Wrote: I discriminate against tards & those with a nigger attitude, not to mention low class assholes. Oh, how you can turn my straight side on!!!! RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Eat Shit And Die - 10-27-2012 (10-26-2012, 11:35 AM)ramseycat Wrote: No trolls. I enjoy the freedom to say what I want here. I enjoy interacting with several members on this forum. Those that I don't really care for I ignore or tell them how I see it. I like being able to do that. I'm a troll why am I still here or invited none the less from a troll board? STFU RamScat (10-26-2012, 01:07 PM)username Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:56 PM)Clang McFly Wrote: ME-OW! Isn't he.... (10-26-2012, 03:35 PM)FAHQTOO Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:26 PM)ramseycat Wrote:(10-26-2012, 12:19 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: It seems to me you've been more than fair to many who've ended being clubbed with the ban hammer. You don't have a dick thats why. (10-27-2012, 05:29 AM)Duchess Wrote:(10-26-2012, 10:40 PM)OnBendedKnee Wrote: What you do here at MOCK regarding membership is not segregation. Your BBQ your decision. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Duchess - 10-27-2012 (10-27-2012, 05:57 AM)ESAD Wrote: Your BBQ your decision. I happen to know that one of the reasons you come here is because of the people I keep out. ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Duchess - 10-27-2012 (10-27-2012, 05:55 AM)Sphincter Cop Wrote: Oh, how you can turn my straight side on!!!! Heh Heh Heh ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - aussiefriend - 10-27-2012 If Sphincter Cop wasn't gay I would marry him.....today. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Duchess - 10-27-2012 People register daily. They lurk & read, make the decision to join and once faced with starting an intro thread they are at a complete loss. ![]() RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - QueenBee - 10-27-2012 I think it is hard to judge people on a few early posts. They are just testing the waters, and we are testing them. I kind of liked when we had Newbie Hell...were we could see how they stood up to interrogation. But if they join, post a proper intro post..and join in as soon as activated, then I say give them a shot Not newbie hell...but just a day or two of limited access to see how much they participate. I know when I first join a forum, I am taking time to read older shit, and also posting as much as I can, to get my name recognised. I think if a newbie shows that kind of interest, they may be a keeper/ But, some you just cannot see the real them until they have been here a while. MA was an idiot. RE: WOULD YOU AGREE? - Duchess - 10-27-2012 I try to move all intro threads straight into the newbie forum as quickly as I can. I prefer to turn them over to all of you rather than keep them in Purgatory, that invisible forum is a pain in my ass but necessary. There are a couple in there right now who will never get access. |