The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.27 (Linux)
|
Dear @username: Warning Request - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Personal Member Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Some Honest Therapy (https://mockforums.net/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: Dear @username: Warning Request (/thread-8515.html) |
RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - krystalshores - 07-16-2012 (07-16-2012, 09:57 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-16-2012, 09:54 PM)krystalshores Wrote: Ok then, let's see. Awe, I kind of feel bad now. You know I was mostly just kidding right? RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - username - 07-16-2012 (07-16-2012, 09:54 PM)krystalshores Wrote: Ok then, let's see. You're filing a petty complaint that I warn HotD so I don't get more petty complaints? Just checking. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - username - 07-16-2012 (07-16-2012, 10:01 PM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote:(07-16-2012, 09:08 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-16-2012, 08:59 PM)krystalshores Wrote:(07-16-2012, 08:50 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I would like to be a character witness for aussie, but I'm still pressing forward with the warning request, for her own good and that of the board. Best to nip it in the bud. WTF is resosance? RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - krystalshores - 07-16-2012 Yeah, pretty much. I thought you might see it that way. See its already started. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Jimbone - 07-16-2012 I'd like to handle the sentencing portion for these fine ladies...err, I mean forum rabble rousers. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - HairOfTheDog - 07-16-2012 (07-16-2012, 11:07 PM)krystalshores Wrote: You know I was mostly just kidding right? Of course! RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Riotgear - 07-17-2012 Mostly? RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Ma Huang Sor - 07-17-2012 WTF is resosance? It's a New Word for you to use. Resonance occurs when a system is able to store and easily transfer energy between two or more different storage modes (such as kinetic energy and potential energy in the case of a pendulum). However, there are some losses from cycle to cycle, called damping. When damping is small, the resonant frequency is approximately equal to the natural frequency of the system, which is a frequency of unforced vibrations. Some systems have multiple, distinct, resonant frequencies. In layman's terms a kind of vibrational echo. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - HairOfTheDog - 07-17-2012 Well, I'm still not quite sure what the implication to the post was, but I do understand what it means for a vibration or message to "resonate". Sometimes I feel like I need a translator or decoder ring here lately, then I realize it probably won't matter a few posts from now. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - HairOfTheDog - 07-17-2012 (07-17-2012, 01:16 AM)Riotgear Wrote: Mostly? I think maybe KS realizes that I was being serious about one of the alleged infractions that I posted; we need more celebrity hair critiques in this place. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Donovan - 07-17-2012 (07-17-2012, 11:48 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, I'm still not quite sure what the implication to the post was, but I do understand what it means for a vibration or message to "resonate". It just means somebody broke out the extra fancy asskissing, the kind with the little tongue swirl swooshy move at the end. Shut up and enjoy it lolol. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Ma Huang Sor - 07-17-2012 (07-17-2012, 11:48 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, I'm still not quite sure what the implication to the post was, but I do understand what it means for a vibration or message to "resonate". It means I shouldn't respond to your posts after my second glass of wine, mostly. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Riotgear - 07-17-2012 Oh hey look - It's the 'second glass of wine' excuse making yet another appearance. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - HairOfTheDog - 09-15-2012 (07-16-2012, 08:06 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Dear @username, UPDATE: I'd like to formally cancel out all complaints listed above. They are no longer valid (well, they never really were valid, haha). BUT, for consideration, some truly valid potential warnings may have since emerged - thusly: (1.) Dangerously hilarious drunken posting. (2.) Dangerously unhilarious drunken posting. (3.) Obsessing about shit related to other posters obsessing about shit related to other posters. I'm personally in camps (1) and (3), but will trust the Mock authorities to move forward (or not) as they see fit. Sincerely, HairOfTheDog RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - HairOfTheDog - 09-15-2012 (07-16-2012, 11:15 PM)Jimbone Wrote: I'd like to handle the sentencing portion for these fine ladies...err, I mean forum rabble rousers. I'd like to hear what sentencing Mr. Bone has in mind for the female posters in this thread - namely: aussie, sally, krystal, username, and Hairy (I left Maggot, Donovan and OBK out because I do believe 100% that they are physically "male"). RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - username - 09-15-2012 (09-15-2012, 12:18 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: UPDATE: I'd like to formally cancel out all complaints listed above. They are no longer valid (well, they never really were valid, haha). While I like #2 very much, Aussie was cited and warned yesterday for Drunk & Disorderly Conduct in Mock and PWI. With all her botox, I think punishment should include attempting to raise her eyebrows at least a half inch and posting a picture. RE: Dear @username: Warning Request - Maggot - 09-15-2012 (09-15-2012, 01:32 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-16-2012, 11:15 PM)Jimbone Wrote: I'd like to handle the sentencing portion for these fine ladies...err, I mean forum rabble rousers. Lemme check..................Yup, still attached. |