The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.26 (Linux)
|
What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Discussions, Opinions & Debate (https://mockforums.net/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? (/thread-3594.html) |
RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - D - 01-12-2010 Why do you say comments with ETA? That comment has an Estimated Time of Arrival? RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - Duchess - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 05:04 PM)username Wrote: ETA: BTW, thanks for the "warning". Like I care. Au Contraire, fat assed newbie fuck...Obviously you do care or you would have totally disregarded it & never mentioned it...Now, be a good lil' newbie fuck & show me how you moo, I'd find that entertaining, oh yes, I would... RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - Duchess - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 05:13 PM)D Wrote: Why do you say comments with ETA? 'Cuz she's an idiot...See if you can get her to moo. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - LuMPyPussy - 01-12-2010 She's gonna care about the warnings when she gets enough that temp bans her ass. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - The Antagonist - 01-12-2010 Only if Frank set it up to do that Lumpy. Oh and I saw ramsey use that ETA shit too. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - sally - 01-12-2010 I think it means edited to add. Which is fucking lame because no one can see that you edited your post anyway so why would you want to tell them. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - username - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 05:32 PM)LuMPyPussy Wrote: She's gonna care about the warnings when she gets enough that temp bans her ass. I'm not sure I could survive losing my beloved mock forum. :'( RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - username - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 05:48 PM)sally Wrote: I think it means edited to add. Bingo. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - username - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 05:29 PM)Duchess Wrote: Au Contraire, fat assed newbie fuck...Obviously you do care or you would have totally disregarded it & never mentioned it... I mentioned it because I find it amusing that a supposedly grown woman is running around issuing warnings--Mock Forum Police, at your service. I think you might need to cut back on the stimulants or something. You seem to be taking this all just a little too seriously. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - Duchess - 01-12-2010 Go tell it to all involved who put the warning system in...I'm sure they would be interested in your thoughts & feelings with regard to that...::sneaky:: RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - SyberBitch - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 06:00 PM)username Wrote:(01-12-2010, 05:29 PM)Duchess Wrote: Au Contraire, fat assed newbie fuck...Obviously you do care or you would have totally disregarded it & never mentioned it... Warning for what? RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - D - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 05:51 PM)username Wrote:(01-12-2010, 05:48 PM)sally Wrote: I think it means edited to add. Then both the twats need to learn the proper way to do this its: Edit: BLAH BLAH BLAH Edit: Because ETA means Estimated Time of Arrival, you cunt twats. And also you CAN see if someone has edited their post. You just don't know where its at... and you're blind. Edit 2: nvm, you can't see it anymore. Twat face Frank removed it from showing. Asswipe. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - Middle Finger - 01-12-2010 I don't know of any current member this is under the age of 18, so I just ignore all this bullshit. If certain people want to be super annoying they will eventually break my patented "do not annoy me too much" rule and risk the wrath of my Italian Sausage. Now I say that with this understanding: most people here give way more of a fuck than I do about who posts what. Most people seem to have a harder time Ignoring users or threads they don't like. So, I admit that I do not fully read everything or get as emotional. That sort of works to my favor because something has to build before I take action in many regards. In other words, my basic feeling here is - STFU about guessing ages and complaining, and if anyone seriously tries to make this a mommy forum or annoying close to it, it is not going to work - PERIOD. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - username - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 06:11 PM)SyberBitch Wrote: Warning for what? This is what it says: Mock is not a cooking forum where recipes are exchanged. It would behoove you to remember that. I love the use of the word "behoove" there. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - SyberBitch - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 06:21 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: I don't know of any current member this is under the age of 18, so I just ignore all this bullshit. Give us a kiss RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - SyberBitch - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 06:23 PM)username Wrote:(01-12-2010, 06:11 PM)SyberBitch Wrote: Warning for what? 'behoove'??? Is this one of their 'cow' references? ::lol:: RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - username - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 06:21 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: If certain people want to be super annoying they will eventually break my patented "do not annoy me too much" rule and risk the wrath of my Italian Sausage. I bet its mild. I like hot Italian Sausage myself. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - Middle Finger - 01-12-2010 A lot of garlic is involved, regardless ... RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - ramseycat - 01-12-2010 OOOOO Frank putting his foot down. RE: What are your thoughts on pacifiers? - username - 01-12-2010 (01-12-2010, 07:11 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: A lot of garlic is involved, regardless ... Garlic is good! |