The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.26 (Linux)
|
WHO ARE YOU? - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Personal Member Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Some Honest Therapy (https://mockforums.net/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: WHO ARE YOU? (/thread-8575.html) |
RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 04:13 PM)Duchess Wrote:(07-31-2012, 04:00 PM)Riotgear Wrote: we supposted to say who we _really_ are? I could live with all that. Not so much some of the shit I think in public and some of the shit I've jerked off to. Whoops. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - OnBendedKnee - 07-31-2012 Jerking off to, "It's a Wonderful Life"? Donna Reed was hot. . . RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Eat Shit And Die - 07-31-2012 In a one in the pink two in the stink kinda way. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Jibbles - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 05:48 PM)ESAD Wrote: In a one in the pink two in the stink kinda way. That's what the creepy guy next door used to say about my mother when I was seven. What's it mean? RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Eat Shit And Die - 07-31-2012 I will let your mother tell you, don't forget to ask her to touch her toes first. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - OnBendedKnee - 07-31-2012 ^ Using only her fingers. Please. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 04:45 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-31-2012, 04:00 PM)Riotgear Wrote: So are we supposed to say who we like to think we are in this thread or are we supposted to say who we _really_ are? Wait what? NIGGA PLEASE! RE: WHO ARE YOU? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 08:51 PM)Riotgear Wrote:(07-31-2012, 04:45 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-31-2012, 04:00 PM)Riotgear Wrote: So are we supposed to say who we like to think we are in this thread or are we supposted to say who we _really_ are? So, you're not gonna try to convince me that I'm wrong about myself and that I'm actually very normal, fully engaged in meeting societal expectations, and spryly energetic about addressing every task as it arises. Damn it. I was prepared to go with Dr. RG's assessment. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 08:54 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-31-2012, 08:51 PM)Riotgear Wrote:(07-31-2012, 04:45 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-31-2012, 04:00 PM)Riotgear Wrote: So are we supposed to say who we like to think we are in this thread or are we supposted to say who we _really_ are? Heh. I'm probably not overqualified to determine normalcy. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - OnBendedKnee - 07-31-2012 Being over qualified to determine normalcy is not normal, this making you over qualified to determine as much. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 08:56 PM)Riotgear Wrote: Heh. I'm probably not overqualified to determine normalcy. Which makes you perfect for the job. Your idea of "normalcy" would be relative and I might (just might) meet "standard", assuming we're somewhere in the same general ballpark. No offense meant by that assumption. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Jimbone - 07-31-2012 In the words of Fox Mulder, "How do you define normal?" RE: WHO ARE YOU? - username - 07-31-2012 I'm pretty sure I'm not 100% normal. My normal friends can't comprehend my interest in Mock or any remotely similar forums. It's either me or them. Maybe they're abnormal. *shrugs* RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 09:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-31-2012, 08:56 PM)Riotgear Wrote: Heh. I'm probably not overqualified to determine normalcy. I'm pretty good at appearing normal for several minutes if you don't look too close or ask my wife. Does that count? RE: WHO ARE YOU? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 09:49 PM)Riotgear Wrote:(07-31-2012, 09:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(07-31-2012, 08:56 PM)Riotgear Wrote: Heh. I'm probably not overqualified to determine normalcy. Yep. It counts, imo. But, don't take that as being "sunshiny", please. People who look too closely are the ones you've really gotta worry about. Why can't they just be as shallow and self-absorbed as the rest of us? Weirdos. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 Amen to that. I've got a lot of crooked, perverted shit to fantasize about. I don't need a bunch of amateurs offering up all kind of bullshit subjective critiques. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - HairOfTheDog - 07-31-2012 (07-31-2012, 09:17 PM)Jimbone Wrote: In the words of Fox Mulder, "How do you define normal?" Mr. Mulder's inquiry was a good one. I used to wonder about such things, but have long since given up pondering about "normal" when it comes to human nature. It's all contingent upon where you're sitting and the view (figuratively and literally), imo. normalcy - expectedness as a consequence of being usual or regular or common I don't see too many at Mock trying too hard to come off as regular or common when they're obviously not. Good. Maybe, every now and again, some seem to be trying hard not to seem regular and common when they obviously are. Not sure why. I think most of us are probably regular and common in some aspects of our lives and beings, and full on freaks in others. Nothing wrong with either or both, imo. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 One of the many benefits of a clear conscience is a front row seat to some spectacularly raw and deeply human thoughts and ideas. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - OnBendedKnee - 07-31-2012 Sometimes though, in real life, it's more comfortable to sit in the back, in the dark, and ruminate over miseries and lost expectations. RE: WHO ARE YOU? - Riotgear - 07-31-2012 What is this real life you speak of? |