The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.26 (Linux)
|
INSURRECTION - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: INSURRECTION (/thread-14617.html) |
RE: INSURRECTION - Maggot - 08-27-2022 If it was really about "breaking the law" then the riots where the police station got lit up or the federal courthouse would have brought down a few perps but no. It depends on who is offended. This just happened close to the politicians and that is what makes it bad. THEY were scared. Joe Public not so much. Much like the border. It's OK as long as they stay there, but start shipping them to DC and hey look, we have a problem. RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-27-2022 (08-27-2022, 04:09 PM)Maggot Wrote: If it was really about "breaking the law" then the riots where the police station got lit up or the federal courthouse would have brought down a few perps but no. It depends on who is offended. This just happened close to the politicians and that is what makes it bad. THEY were scared. Joe Public not so much. Maggot, trump had more than 300 classified documents, they were not his property, he stole them and then refused to give them back. That's not politics, that's trump being a thief. They gave him every opportunity to do so and bent over backwards treating him with kid gloves. These were documents from the CIA, FBI and the National Security Agency. Some of these documents were related to our spies and their work and most of the documents have the highest level of classification, they are top secret/sensitive and trump took them, they are not his to take and the National Archives have been trying for 1 1⁄2 years to get them back. Why in the world would you think this is okay? It's not, not by any stretch of the imagination. RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-27-2022 I'm just now noticing the way he threw in the border & immigrants at the end. RE: INSURRECTION - rothschild - 08-27-2022 Garland's A-OK with his "peaceful protesters" threatening violence against cities if juries don't decide in accordance with their demands, and you're A-OK with that because you're a partisan zombie. In another year you'll believe that men are biological women. RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-27-2022 BlahBlahBlah--so many of you always try to turn it into something else. RE: INSURRECTION - sally - 08-27-2022 Well you can't really pretend to be outraged over one thing and totally disregard another. RE: INSURRECTION - rothschild - 08-27-2022 (08-27-2022, 07:14 PM)Duchess Wrote: BlahBlahBlah--so many of you always try to turn it into something else. Inconsistency is the hallmark of fallacy. You equate ideological orthodoxy with truth, thus it's impossible for you to be wrong. RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-27-2022 What in the name of god does any of that have to do with trump stealing highly classified documents? Jesus Christ, rothschild, that shit just never gets old with you, does it. RE: INSURRECTION - Carsman - 08-27-2022 Said it up thread. “He” took “Top Secret” documents. He must pay for that! Regular spies get the “ Firing Squad”! He should get . . . . . . RE: INSURRECTION - Maggot - 08-27-2022 What "top secret" papers did he take? Or is that to general of a description. He told them what he had, they even said to put them in a place that was secure and gave him a lock which they broke into later. He gave them all of what they asked for months before but it wasn't until the Jan 6th committee found nothing did they decide the best way was to raid his house. I'm sure as the "investigation" moves along more excuses will be found to justify their raid. RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-28-2022 Like I said, there's no low that's too low for you to support & defend when it comes to trump. You are trumpian through & through. You even defended & supported trump when he sided with Putin over America. Why are you so anti-American, man? RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-28-2022 (08-27-2022, 08:50 PM)Carsman Wrote: Said it up thread. “He” took “Top Secret” documents. He must pay for that! Last year the CIA warned that a number of their informants were being captured & killed. Most, if not all, of the documents trump stole had to do with our national security. RE: INSURRECTION - Maggot - 08-28-2022 I would like to know what "documents" he supposedly had. The FBI is not a very truthful organization and will do just about anything to advance their agenda. They are the American KGB. Very politically motivated and Trump pissed them off a few times. RE: INSURRECTION - Carsman - 08-28-2022 (08-28-2022, 08:56 AM)Maggot Wrote: I would like to know what "documents" he supposedly had. The FBI is not a very truthful organization and will do just about anything to advance their agenda. They are the American KGB. Very politically motivated and Trump pissed them off a few times. You’re not allowed to know that, it’s Top Secret! RE: INSURRECTION - pyropappy - 08-28-2022 everyone, do yourself a favor, Google - "Operation Mockingbird". It is from the 1970's, and things have only gotten worse. I will say for the last time - trust this government at your own peril. That means both parties. RE: INSURRECTION - sally - 08-28-2022 (08-28-2022, 01:26 PM)pyropappy Wrote: everyone, do yourself a favor, Google - "Operation Mockingbird". It is from the 1970's, and things have only gotten worse. I will say for the last time - trust this government at your own peril. That means both parties. It's pretty obvious that's what is happening, but not enough people give a shit obviously. RE: INSURRECTION - MirahM - 08-28-2022 But Hunter's laptop and Hilary's emails! Oh My! RE: INSURRECTION - rothschild - 08-28-2022 (08-28-2022, 06:43 PM)MirahM Wrote: But Hunter's laptop and Hilary's emails! Oh My! Exactly, because it's too tiresome for you respond intelligently. Better to continue feeding into the partisan immaturity, and help to ensure it's continuation. RE: INSURRECTION - BigMark - 08-28-2022 hunter is dirty no doubt about it RE: INSURRECTION - Duchess - 08-28-2022 (08-28-2022, 07:24 PM)rothschild Wrote: Exactly, because it's too tiresome for you respond intelligently. Better to continue feeding into the partisan immaturity, and help to ensure it's continuation. Please do come down off your high horse. You're the last person who should be weighing in on how the conversation progresses given what you do. |