+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Management and Newbie Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Introductions (https://mockforums.net/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: pinkyfloyd (/thread-4755.html)
RE: pinkyfloyd - username - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 12:31 AM)IMaDick Wrote: come on show us some of those inner balls Maggot talks so much about.
I think the proper medical term is undescended testicles.
RE: pinkyfloyd - username - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 12:31 AM)pinkyfloyd Wrote:(02-05-2011, 12:23 AM)username Wrote: Alrightee then. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
personally i'm not too disappointed to be the source of a woman's thoughts of pussy. it's a little kinky in a kinky sort of way, and who doesn't mind a little kink now and again?
-pink
Trust me, if you're a guy, you don't want a heterosexual woman thinking "pussy" thoughts about you. Ever. At all. Not even a little bit.
RE: pinkyfloyd - username - 02-05-2011
On the other hand, go ahead and fantasize about some girl on girl action with you as the main course. You all do. Men are weird.
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:04 AM)username Wrote: Trust me, if you're a guy, you don't want a heterosexual woman thinking "pussy" thoughts about you. Ever. At all. Not even a little bit.
well let's be honest here, it's not as though she and i were in the middle of some hot foreplay and she suddenly taps me on the head and says "not quite doing it for me, baby...i just really need to eat some pussy right now."
it was in reference to my less than masculine signature line.
not that there's anything wrong with that...
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:09 AM)username Wrote: On the other hand, go ahead and fantasize about some girl on girl action with you as the main course. You all do. Men are weird.
correct me if I'm wrong but girl-on-girl action with me as the main course is officially a threesome, is it not?
you're implying you'd never fantasize about you and a couple strapping young studs fawning over your every orifice?
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - username - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:17 AM)pinkyfloyd Wrote: you're implying you'd never fantasize about you and a couple strapping young studs fawning over your every orifice?
-pink
I'd consider it...if they weren't interested in each others' orifices. It's all about me!!!!:B
Men, on the other hand, seem to get off on the whole woman on woman thing. I SO wouldn't enjoy watching two men get it on. Not that there's anything wrong with that but it's the opposite of a turn on to me.
BTW, what were we talking about before this thread totally derailed?
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:40 AM)username Wrote:(02-05-2011, 01:17 AM)pinkyfloyd Wrote: you're implying you'd never fantasize about you and a couple strapping young studs fawning over your every orifice?
-pink
I'd consider it...if they weren't interested in each others' orifices. It's all about me!!!!:B
Men, on the other hand, seem to get off on the whole woman on woman thing. I SO wouldn't enjoy watching two men get it on. Not that there's anything wrong with that but it's the opposite of a turn on to me.
BTW, what were we talking about before this thread totally derailed?
blame cracker, she started it.
actually it's been shown that both heterosexual men and heterosexual women are pretty much equally turned on by two attractive woman going at it. on the same note, the percentages are about the same across both men and women that are turned off by two men going at it.
i mention this because you did choose to mention that watching two bears boning each other would be a tremendous turnoff, but you neglected to provide your opinion with regards to two luscious lesbos in a 69.
not like it's required or anything, just saying. we're getting half the story.
regardless, blame cracker. whatever it is, it's her fault.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - username - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:47 AM)pinkyfloyd Wrote: blame cracker, she started it.
actually it's been shown that both heterosexual men and heterosexual women are pretty much equally turned on by two attractive woman going at it. regardless, blame cracker. whatever it is, it's her fault.
-pink
Yes, Cracker started it, yes, I'd actually rather see two women go at it and yes, god dammit, this is all Cracker's fault! That lesbo bitch!
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:54 AM)username Wrote: and yes, god dammit, this is all Cracker's fault! That lesbo bitch!
well for your sake i hope she lives close by.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - Cracker - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 01:54 AM)username Wrote: Yes, Cracker started it, yes, I'd actually rather see two women go at it and yes, god dammit, this is all Cracker's fault! That lesbo bitch!
I did consider giving up dick for a brief period. One night at the Coronet Club in ATL an overgrown nude dancer shook his package at our table and got ball sweat on my face. I was so stricken I got instant IBS. Then I was so freaked out by pooping in public I had to go straight home.
Not all nude is good nude.
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 02:08 AM)Cracker Wrote: Not all nude is good nude.
"naked hair brushing, good. naked crouching, bad."
i gotta admit i never totally got that one. i've seen naked crouching that's kept me hard for hours.
"the femal body is a work of art. the male body, it's utilitarian. it's for gettin around. it's like a jeep."
that, i get.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - Cracker - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 02:16 AM)pinkyfloyd Wrote:(02-05-2011, 02:08 AM)Cracker Wrote: Not all nude is good nude.
"naked hair brushing, good. naked crouching, bad."
i gotta admit i never totally got that one. i've seen naked crouching that's kept me hard for hours.
"the femal body is a work of art. the male body, it's utilitarian. it's for gettin around. it's like a jeep."
that, i get.
-pink
Here, enjoy your night:
RE: pinkyfloyd - Cracker - 02-05-2011
Or if you prefer blondes:
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 02:21 AM)Cracker Wrote: Here, enjoy your night:
wonderful. and i was under the impression it had been holstered for the night.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - Cracker - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 02:23 AM)pinkyfloyd Wrote:(02-05-2011, 02:21 AM)Cracker Wrote: Here, enjoy your night:
wonderful. and i was under the impression it had been holstered for the night.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 02:24 AM)Cracker Wrote:
as the saying goes, always time for one more.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - Duchess - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 02:08 AM)Cracker Wrote: I was so stricken I got instant IBS. Then I was so freaked out by pooping in public I had to go straight home.
My first laugh out loud moment of the day.RE: pinkyfloyd - pinkyfloyd - 02-05-2011
(02-05-2011, 05:46 AM)Duchess Wrote:
always nice to happen first thing in the morning.
and as usual, blame the cracker.
-pink
RE: pinkyfloyd - Cracker - 02-06-2011
(02-04-2011, 07:46 PM)pinkyfloyd Wrote: as far as capitalization goes, one has the capability to reach certain levels of grammar stewardship that allow for such poetic license with no capitalization rules at whatsoever. i feel i have reached such levels, and if there is ever a large audience that feels otherwise, i'll be more than happy to adhere to 110% strict grammar and spelling in all facets of writing for a specified trial period in order to prove my knowledge thereof.
until then, you might just have to be satisfied with the occasional capitalization of certain proper nouns or articles.
-pink
You can only give yourself poetic license if you write poetry. The most you can get away with in prose is Faulknerian stream of consciousness. Anything else is a reach.
RE: pinkyfloyd - Lady Cop - 02-07-2011
pinky turned out to be an asshole post whore. i wouldn't mind that he sent me stupid sexual PMs. have any of you EVER seen me invite that shit? never.
but he PMed me that he has a high IQ. hahahahha he was so full of himself. i am so impressed. he says he isn't coming back but he will. he's a post whore. i welcomed him but everyone got sick of him. they are glad he's STFU for now.
and for the record...his crime theories are stupid. i tried hard not to call him a moron.