+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Assholes In The News (https://mockforums.net/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: 3rd chance? (/thread-11170.html)
3rd chance? - thekid65 - 05-24-2014
If one gets a second chance, and fails after only 2 months, how in the hell does he get a 3rd chance? For that matter, how does he even get a 2nd chance in this case?
http://news.yahoo.com/california-judge-says-serial-rapist-released-190825331.html
RE: 3rd chance? - Duchess - 05-24-2014
(05-24-2014, 06:04 AM)thekid65 Wrote: how in the hell does he get a 3rd chance? For that matter, how does he even get a 2nd chance in this case?
I don't know how that happens, Kid but this isn't the first time I've seen something like this regarding rapists. I recently saw a judge give one 30 days. Go figure.
RE: 3rd chance? - thekid65 - 05-24-2014
Meanwhile, in jail....there sits a poor fucker who gets caught with a couple of oz's of weed.....
RE: 3rd chance? - HairOfTheDog - 05-24-2014
Arghh -- this release has been bugging the shit outta me.
![[Image: Chris_Evans_Hubbart_460.jpg]](http://www.sanjoseinside.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Chris_Evans_Hubbart_460.jpg)
^ Christopher Hubbart shouldn't have been paroled the first time, IMO.
But, light and concurrent sentences, and easy parole, for rape forty years ago wasn't uncommon (and, as Duchess mentioned, some judges today are still too soft on statutory and non-stranger rape.)
If he'd gotten consecutive 16 year sentences for each of his 40 rape victims, he'd never have seen the light of day.
Anyway, on this one, I don't blame the judge solely. He's following the law. Hubbart served his time. Then, he was kicked into psychiatric incarceration because prison officials didn't want him on the streets.
It's the psychiatrists who are contending that he's ready for release and want him set free. Well, kinda free.
Snip:
"Now we are preparing for his arrival," said District Attorney Jackie Lacey, who spent months fighting Hubbart's release. "We will do everything within our authority to protect the residents of Los Angeles County from this dangerous predator."
Hubbart will wear a 24-hour, seven-day-a-week GPS monitor on his ankle and will be accompanied by security people every time he goes out in public for the first six months to a year of his release, Lacey said. He will be transported to therapy sessions twice a week."
Shiny new ankle bracelet, security guards, transportation -- sounds like rock-star treatment -- paid for by the taxpayers. The people of Palmdale are just thrilled about his upcoming arrival in their community!
Hubbart's only 63. I hope when the attention on him starts to wane that he doesn't rape somebody else - assuming, once his security ends, he's not taken out by one of the many outraged citizens of the "remote California desert community" he'll be calling home.
RE: 3rd chance? - thekid65 - 05-24-2014
Well, the statutory rape thing can really walk a fine line. I think judges should have a bit of leeway in cases where an 18 year old is caught with a 16-17 year old. I've seen the cases where the poor 18 year old gets the book thrown at him, put in jail, and is labeled a sex offender by judges that follow the letter of the law. That shit aint right.
RE: 3rd chance? - HairOfTheDog - 05-24-2014
(05-24-2014, 11:32 AM)thekid65 Wrote: That shit aint right.
I agree - that ain't the shit to which I was referring.
Teacher/student statutory was on my mind -- lots of those hitting the news lately. Most of the time, the teacher is at least 10 years older and, of course, in a position of influence over the minor.
Sometimes the teacher gets the book thrown at him/her, and other times just a slap on the wrist. Very inconsistent sentencing across states, judges, juries...
Anyway, Hubbart is the lowest of the low. Violently raping 40 unsuspecting strangers -- he should be caged for life, IMO. I've spent a little time in Palmdale. I don't foresee him being treated cordially there, ever. Good.
RE: 3rd chance? - thekid65 - 05-24-2014
Yeah, I dont quite get why he was even eligible for parole in the first place. Maybe things were a bit more liberal in the 70's courts...I dunno.